Savor Our Victory Over the Establishment
Prediction Markets Are Not News and Neither Is CNN
Spare Us the Selective Outrage
Fraudsters Run Amok
250 and Hauling
Debbie Wasserman Schultz Learns the Cost of Racial Identity Politics
One Ballot Measure Extends California's Taxing Power. Another Limits It. Stay Tuned.
Advice for Ken Paxton
New York Is Taxing Itself Into Irrelevance
The Long War of Attrition: Iran, Trump, and the Nuclear Deadlock
Beware Distracted Drivers This Summer
Can AOC and Bernie Sell Socialism in Big Sky Country?
The Collapse of Late Night — and the Opportunity Ahead for Byron Allen
U.S. Military Reportedly Shoots Down 4 Iranian Drones Launched at Commercial Ship
Gun Rights Groups Rush to Court After Maryland Bans Glocks
Tipsheet

Biden COVID-19 Adviser: Bring On the Lockdowns

Biden COVID-19 Adviser: Bring On the Lockdowns
AP Photo/Lynne Sladky

A member of Joe Biden’s coronavirus task force on Wednesday embraced the idea of more lockdowns as a way to manage the pandemic after saying earlier in the week that the U.S. is "about to enter COVID hell.”

Advertisement

Dr. Michael Osterholm, the director of the Center of Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, said a four-to-six week lockdown could be necessary.

“We could pay for a package right now to cover all of the wages, lost wages for individual workers, for losses to small companies, to medium-sized companies or city, state, county governments. We could do all of that,” he said. “If we did that, then we could lock down for four to six weeks.”

In an op-ed he co-authored in August, Osterholm argued the springtime lockdown was problematic because it wasn’t strict enough.

“The problem with the March-to-May lockdown was that it was not uniformly stringent across the country. For example, Minnesota deemed 78 percent of its workers essential,” he and Minneapolis Federal Reserve President Neel Kashkari wrote in The New York Times. “To be effective, the lockdown has to be as comprehensive and strict as possible.”

On Wednesday, he highlighted New Zealand and Australia as models.

“We could really watch ourselves cruising into the vaccine availability in the first and second quarter of next year while bringing back the economy long before that,” he added.

Advertisement

Another Biden coronavirus task force member believes, however, in a “Fair Priority Model" over "vaccine nationalism," meaning that any U.S.-developed vaccine would start being distributed internationally before all Americans received one. 

“Reasonable national partiality does not permit retaining more vaccine than the amount needed to keep the rate of transmission (Rt) below 1, when that vaccine could instead mitigate substantial COVID-19–related harms in other countries that have been unable to keep Rt below 1 through ongoing public-health efforts," Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel co-wrote in an article titled "An ethical framework for global vaccine allocation."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement