The Left’s War on Truth and How You Can Fight Back
So, That's the REAL Story Behind Top DOJ Attorneys Leaving Amid the Minneapolis...
The Warmth of Collectivism
Remember When Following the Science Was Required Because It Was Settled? Well, the...
The Left Will Never Give Up Global Warming
Like Two Ships Passing in the Night
Did You See the NYT Piece About the Death of Scott Adams?
Shameless Ilhan Omar Accuses Trump of Wasting Taxpayer Dollars
No Compromise on the Hyde Amendment
Traditional Families and American Prosperity
In the End, Tyrannies Always Collapse
Iran Past, Present, and Future: A Conversation With Marziyeh Amirizadeh, Part 1
Trump’s Right to Target Private Equity
When Washington Picks Winners, Innovation Loses
Minnesota House Moves to Impeach Tim Walz
Tipsheet

ACB Quickly Corrects Klobuchar's False Statement About Recusal From Any 2020 Election Case

AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster, Pool

Judge Amy Coney Barrett fired back at Sen. Amy Klobuchar on Wednesday on the issue of whether, if confirmed, she would recuse herself from a case pertaining to the 2020 election, should one arise. 

Advertisement

The topic came up as the senator pressed the judge about the fact that she briefly worked on the Bush v. Gore case as did Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh.

"Having justices with this background…decide any cases related to the upcoming election, do you think that will undermine the legitimacy of the court?” Klobuchar asked.

Barrett refused to take the bait, responding that she appeared to be “trying to elicit a question about whether it would be appropriate for justices who participated in that litigation to sit on the case rather than recuse, and I went down that road yesterday saying it’s a legal question.”

“I know, you said you wouldn’t recuse,” Klobuchar jumped in.

Barrett interjected, “That isn’t what I said. I said I wouldn’t commit, I wouldn’t pre-commit.”

Advertisement

On Tuesday, the judge responded to questioning about recusal from Sen. Patrick Leahy.

"I commit to you to fully and faithfully apply the law of recusal and part of that law is to consider any 'appearances' questions" — as in, even whether it might look to outsiders as though the judge couldn't be fair, Barrett said. "I can't offer a legal conclusion right now about the outcome of the decision I would reach."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement