GOP Rep Teased More Debauchery Involving Eric Swalwell Was Coming Before He Resigned
Appeals Court Just Struck Down 158-Year-Old Nanny State Law
The Left Continues to Transition Away From Protecting Women
The Eric Swalwell Implosion Has the Press Desperately Explaining Why They Hadn't Broken...
Graham Platner Blames the Military for His Nazi Tattoo, Troubling Social Media History
Flashback: Here's What Eric Swalwell Said About Biden's DOJ Going After Trump Associates
Did Another Illegal Immigrant Truck Driver Just Kill a Family of Three in...
The Red Ryder BB Gun Is a Right of Passage...That's About to Be...
Watch This Woman Wipe the Floor With Rep. Ro Khanna After He Claims...
Federal Judge Tosses Trump's Defamation Lawsuit Against the WSJ Over Epstein Article
Scott Jennings: 'Here's Something You Must Understand About the Left'
Exclusive: Texas GOP Official Says Anti-Trump Candidate Tried to Conceal Background of Dem...
California Democrats Just Revealed Their New Scheme to Protect Fraudsters
This News From Tony Gonzales Just Made Eric Swalwell's Resignation A LOT More...
Eric Swalwell to Resign From Congress
Tipsheet

Report: Pentagon Hid Study Exposing Billions in Bureaucratic Waste

Report: Pentagon Hid Study Exposing Billions in Bureaucratic Waste

The Pentagon is coming under fire for hiding a study that exposed billions in waste, fearing Congress would cut the defense budget as a result, The Washington Post has learned.

Advertisement

The report found that the Defense Department was paying more than 1 million contractors, civilians, and uniformed personnel to fill back-office jobs that support the 1.3 million active duty troops.

The internal study was requested to help come up with savings in combat power as well as make the bureaucracy more efficient, but when the report revealed $125 billion in administrative waste—far more than anticipated—senior defense officials were quick to bury it.

But some Pentagon leaders said they fretted that by spotlighting so much waste, the study would undermine their repeated public assertions that years of budget austerity had left the armed forces starved of funds. Instead of providing more money, they said, they worried Congress and the White House might decide to cut deeper.

So the plan was killed. The Pentagon imposed secrecy restrictions on the data making up the study, which ensured no one could replicate the findings. A 77-page summary report that had been made public was removed from a Pentagon website. [...]

“They’re all complaining that they don’t have any money. We proposed a way to save a ton of money,” Robert “Bobby” L. Stein, a private-equity investor who served as chairman of the Defense Business Board, told the Post.

Advertisement

Related:

PENTAGON

“We’re going to be in peril because we’re spending dollars like it doesn’t matter,” he added.

On the campaign trail Donald Trump promised to build up the military, paying for it with savings from waste.

“I will ask that savings be accomplished through common sense reforms that eliminate government waste and budget gimmicks,” he said in a September speech to the Union League of Philadelphia.

While the Pentagon is a good place to start, the next big challenge will be getting Congress on board.

Arnold Punaro, a retired Marine general and former staff director for the Senate Armed Services Committee, told the Post just how difficult that will be because lawmakers resist even the slightest attempts to cut the Pentagon's workforce, fearing jobs in their districts will be lost.

Without support from Congress, “you can’t even get rid of the guy serving butter in the chow hall in a local district, much less tens of thousands of jobs,” he told the Post.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos