About That 'Racist' Video the Trump Team Posted Featuring the Obamas...It's a Fake...
Over 800 Google Workers Demand the Company Cut Ties With ICE
UNL Student Government Passes SJP-Backed Israel Divestment Resolution
AOC Mourns the Loss of ’Our Media,’ More Layoffs Across the Industry (and...
The Left Just Doesn't Understand Why WaPo Is Failing
16 Years and $16 Billion Later the First Railhead Goes Down for CA's...
Toledo Man Indicted for Threatening to Kill Vice President JD Vance During Ohio...
Fort Lauderdale Financial Advisor Sentenced to 20 Years for $94M International Ponzi Schem...
FCC Is Reportedly Investigating The View
Illegal Immigrant Allegedly Used Stolen Identity to Vote and Collect $400K in Federal...
$26 Billion Gone: Stellantis Joins Automakers Retreating From EVs
House Oversight Chair: Clintons Don’t Get Special Treatment in Epstein Probe
Utah Man Sentenced for Stealing Funds Meant to Aid Ukrainian First Responders
Ex-Bank Employee Pleads Guilty to Laundering $8M for Overseas Criminal Organization
State Department Orders Evacuation of US Citizens in Iran As Possibility of Military...
Tipsheet

Report: Pentagon Hid Study Exposing Billions in Bureaucratic Waste

The Pentagon is coming under fire for hiding a study that exposed billions in waste, fearing Congress would cut the defense budget as a result, The Washington Post has learned.

Advertisement

The report found that the Defense Department was paying more than 1 million contractors, civilians, and uniformed personnel to fill back-office jobs that support the 1.3 million active duty troops.

The internal study was requested to help come up with savings in combat power as well as make the bureaucracy more efficient, but when the report revealed $125 billion in administrative waste—far more than anticipated—senior defense officials were quick to bury it.

But some Pentagon leaders said they fretted that by spotlighting so much waste, the study would undermine their repeated public assertions that years of budget austerity had left the armed forces starved of funds. Instead of providing more money, they said, they worried Congress and the White House might decide to cut deeper.

So the plan was killed. The Pentagon imposed secrecy restrictions on the data making up the study, which ensured no one could replicate the findings. A 77-page summary report that had been made public was removed from a Pentagon website. [...]

“They’re all complaining that they don’t have any money. We proposed a way to save a ton of money,” Robert “Bobby” L. Stein, a private-equity investor who served as chairman of the Defense Business Board, told the Post.

Advertisement

Related:

PENTAGON

“We’re going to be in peril because we’re spending dollars like it doesn’t matter,” he added.

On the campaign trail Donald Trump promised to build up the military, paying for it with savings from waste.

“I will ask that savings be accomplished through common sense reforms that eliminate government waste and budget gimmicks,” he said in a September speech to the Union League of Philadelphia.

While the Pentagon is a good place to start, the next big challenge will be getting Congress on board.

Arnold Punaro, a retired Marine general and former staff director for the Senate Armed Services Committee, told the Post just how difficult that will be because lawmakers resist even the slightest attempts to cut the Pentagon's workforce, fearing jobs in their districts will be lost.

Without support from Congress, “you can’t even get rid of the guy serving butter in the chow hall in a local district, much less tens of thousands of jobs,” he told the Post.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos