MS NOW Shows It Is on Shaky Ground; Lawrence O'Donnell Has Some Odd...
Jeff Bezos' Ex Wife Just Proved Wealth Confiscation Doesn't Work
A Forensic Expert in Colorado Just Pleaded Guilty to Mishandling Data in Dozens...
After Dobbs, Will We Get Life Right on America’s 250th?
The Meaning of America
Two Venezuelan Illegal Aliens Sentenced to Over 6 Years for ATM Jackpotting Scheme...
Whitmer's $1.8 Billion Jobs Plan Delivers 602 Jobs — and a $3 Million...
Trump's Latest D.C. Restoration Is Going To Be Huge
House Set to Pass SAVE America Act for Fourth Time, Johnson Says
John Kasich Is Back and Worse Than Ever
RFK Jr., Dr. Oz: Over 1 Million Enrolled in Obamacare With No Social...
The WNBA's Coordinated Campaign Against Caitlin Clark Is Obvious
Wait, This LA Reporter Was Forced to Apologize After Rooting for Team USA?
U.S. and Iran Exchange New Set of Strikes Just Two Weeks After Peace...
Passing Faith onto the Next Generation
Tipsheet

Iowa Judge Rules That the State's Fetal Heartbeat Abortion Law Is Unconstitutional

Iowa Judge Rules That the State's Fetal Heartbeat Abortion Law Is Unconstitutional
AP Photo/Teresa Crawford

An Iowa judge struck down a law Tuesday that prohibited abortion after the pre-born child’s heartbeat is detected – which typically occurs at roughly six weeks of pregnancy. The law would have been the earliest abortion ban in the country.

Advertisement

Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed the law in May and Planned Parenthood sued.

Judge Michael Huppert of the 5th Judicial District of Iowa, who temporarily blocked the measure in June, ruled in favor of Planned Parenthood and declared that the law was “violative of both the due process and equal protection provisions of the Iowa Constitution as not being narrowly tailored to serve the compelling state interest of promoting potential life.”

In his decision, he argued that fetal viability was what mattered in this case.

“Regardless of when precisely when a fetal heartbeat may be detected in a given pregnancy, it is undisputed that such cardiac activity is detectable well in advance of the fetus becoming viable,” he wrote.

“Viability is not only material to this case, it is dispositive on the present record,” he argued, referencing the Supreme Court’s language in Roe v. Wade.

Advertisement

“The court held that the state’s interest in promoting potential life may only be used to regulate (even to the point of proscription) postviability abortions,” he argued, “except where it is necessary in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother.”

Gov. Kim Reynolds released a statement Tuesday expressing her disappointment in the ruling.

“I am incredibly disappointed in today’s court ruling, because I believe that if death is determined when a heart stops beating, then a beating heart indicates life,” she said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement