Everyone Is Going Nuts and Committing Acts of Mayhem Before Trump Takes Office
Did Anyone Catch What Was Odd About Liz Cheney Getting a Presidential Medal?
Germany's New Morgenthau Plan
Bourbon Street Massacre Is What 'Globalize the Intifada' Looks Like
Biden Makes Bald Eagle America’s National Bird
You Can't Catch What You're Not Looking For
Blood on the News Media’s Hands
Medicare Advantage Deserves a Hard Look From Musk and Ramaswamy
Lax Enforcement of Rules, Misplaced Sympathy Plague Poor School Children
New Year, Same as the Old Year
Despite What the Liberal Media Tells You, Joe Biden Emboldened Terrorist Attacks on...
Joe Biden’s Radical ATF Director Resigns Before Trump Had the Chance to Fire...
The Unexpected Business Booming Under Trump
MSNBC Finally Admits What We All Knew About the Biden Admin
Teachers in This Blue State Will No Longer Need to Pass a Reading,...
Tipsheet

Iowa Judge Rules That the State's Fetal Heartbeat Abortion Law Is Unconstitutional

AP Photo/Teresa Crawford

An Iowa judge struck down a law Tuesday that prohibited abortion after the pre-born child’s heartbeat is detected – which typically occurs at roughly six weeks of pregnancy. The law would have been the earliest abortion ban in the country.

Advertisement

Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed the law in May and Planned Parenthood sued.

Judge Michael Huppert of the 5th Judicial District of Iowa, who temporarily blocked the measure in June, ruled in favor of Planned Parenthood and declared that the law was “violative of both the due process and equal protection provisions of the Iowa Constitution as not being narrowly tailored to serve the compelling state interest of promoting potential life.”

In his decision, he argued that fetal viability was what mattered in this case.

“Regardless of when precisely when a fetal heartbeat may be detected in a given pregnancy, it is undisputed that such cardiac activity is detectable well in advance of the fetus becoming viable,” he wrote.

“Viability is not only material to this case, it is dispositive on the present record,” he argued, referencing the Supreme Court’s language in Roe v. Wade.

Advertisement

“The court held that the state’s interest in promoting potential life may only be used to regulate (even to the point of proscription) postviability abortions,” he argued, “except where it is necessary in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother.”

Gov. Kim Reynolds released a statement Tuesday expressing her disappointment in the ruling.

“I am incredibly disappointed in today’s court ruling, because I believe that if death is determined when a heart stops beating, then a beating heart indicates life,” she said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement