ABC News Host Asked Bill Maher If He'd Vote for JD Vance. You...
Here Are the Two Dems Who Dropped Out of the Contest to Replace...
We Cannot Let These People Socialize Our Healthcare System
One of the DSA's Biggest Influencers Wants to Shred the Declaration of Independence,...
Trump: Strikes Will End 'Any Chance' Iran Gets a Nuclear Missile
Man Sentenced to 5 Years After 15 Years As Fugitive in West Bank
VP JD Vance and Wife Usha Welcome Fourth Child, Baby Boy Alec Neel...
Spain Wins 2026 World Cup
Massachusetts Woman Ordered to Repay $100K in SSI Fraud Case
AOC, Sanders Rally for Democratic Socialist El-Sayed in Senate Primary Fight
Iran Conflict Claims Another American Service Member's Life
Seattle Real Estate Owner Sentenced to 20 Months for Hiding $4.7 Million From...
When ‘Born-Again’ No Longer Means Transformed
The GOP's Path to Retaining Control of the House Is Here
Mississippi Man Pleads Guilty to Stealing Nearly $17K in SNAP Benefits
Tipsheet

Iowa Judge Rules That the State's Fetal Heartbeat Abortion Law Is Unconstitutional

Iowa Judge Rules That the State's Fetal Heartbeat Abortion Law Is Unconstitutional
AP Photo/Teresa Crawford

An Iowa judge struck down a law Tuesday that prohibited abortion after the pre-born child’s heartbeat is detected – which typically occurs at roughly six weeks of pregnancy. The law would have been the earliest abortion ban in the country.

Advertisement

Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed the law in May and Planned Parenthood sued.

Judge Michael Huppert of the 5th Judicial District of Iowa, who temporarily blocked the measure in June, ruled in favor of Planned Parenthood and declared that the law was “violative of both the due process and equal protection provisions of the Iowa Constitution as not being narrowly tailored to serve the compelling state interest of promoting potential life.”

In his decision, he argued that fetal viability was what mattered in this case.

“Regardless of when precisely when a fetal heartbeat may be detected in a given pregnancy, it is undisputed that such cardiac activity is detectable well in advance of the fetus becoming viable,” he wrote.

“Viability is not only material to this case, it is dispositive on the present record,” he argued, referencing the Supreme Court’s language in Roe v. Wade.

Advertisement

“The court held that the state’s interest in promoting potential life may only be used to regulate (even to the point of proscription) postviability abortions,” he argued, “except where it is necessary in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother.”

Gov. Kim Reynolds released a statement Tuesday expressing her disappointment in the ruling.

“I am incredibly disappointed in today’s court ruling, because I believe that if death is determined when a heart stops beating, then a beating heart indicates life,” she said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement