Ignore International Law. There Is no Such Thing
How Ayatollah Khamenei Was Killed Has Been Revealed
Remember the Biden Autopen Investigation? There's Been an Update...and It's Not Good
Hey, Rand Paul, Who's Giving You This Laughably Inaccurate Polling Data on Trump...
Canada's MAiD Program Is a Scarily Efficient Death Machine
Now Virginia Democrats Are Waging War on Free Speech
Save Western Civilization. Read 'Right-Wing Extremist' Books.
Democrats Erected Dishonest Billboards to Trick Virginia Voters on Redistricting
Texas Senate Candidate James Talarico Wanted the Biden Administration to Put Abortion Clin...
So, What Is Normal?
Trump Avoiding Repeating History in Iran
The Supreme Court Should Protect Children From Predators
America Must Lead the Charge Against the Political Abuse of Religion
The Rules Were Never Meant for Them
The U.S. Needs Japan More Than Ever
Tipsheet

Iowa Judge Rules That the State's Fetal Heartbeat Abortion Law Is Unconstitutional

Iowa Judge Rules That the State's Fetal Heartbeat Abortion Law Is Unconstitutional
AP Photo/Teresa Crawford

An Iowa judge struck down a law Tuesday that prohibited abortion after the pre-born child’s heartbeat is detected – which typically occurs at roughly six weeks of pregnancy. The law would have been the earliest abortion ban in the country.

Advertisement

Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed the law in May and Planned Parenthood sued.

Judge Michael Huppert of the 5th Judicial District of Iowa, who temporarily blocked the measure in June, ruled in favor of Planned Parenthood and declared that the law was “violative of both the due process and equal protection provisions of the Iowa Constitution as not being narrowly tailored to serve the compelling state interest of promoting potential life.”

In his decision, he argued that fetal viability was what mattered in this case.

“Regardless of when precisely when a fetal heartbeat may be detected in a given pregnancy, it is undisputed that such cardiac activity is detectable well in advance of the fetus becoming viable,” he wrote.

“Viability is not only material to this case, it is dispositive on the present record,” he argued, referencing the Supreme Court’s language in Roe v. Wade.

Advertisement

“The court held that the state’s interest in promoting potential life may only be used to regulate (even to the point of proscription) postviability abortions,” he argued, “except where it is necessary in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother.”

Gov. Kim Reynolds released a statement Tuesday expressing her disappointment in the ruling.

“I am incredibly disappointed in today’s court ruling, because I believe that if death is determined when a heart stops beating, then a beating heart indicates life,” she said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement