CBS News Left Out a Crucial Detail in Their Shoddy Anti-Trump Piece About...
Tiananmen Timmy Is Racing to Walk Back These Remarks About Tesla
You Can’t Hate The Fake News Media Enough
'How Many Murders Does It Take?' Right Questions on Guns, But For Different...
About Those 100 'Faith Leaders' Who Support Reckless Government Spending
Globalist Debauchery
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 260: Interview with the Museum of the Bible’s...
Trump's DOE: A Course Correction in American Education is Exactly What We Need
Texas May Be Bringing Ibogaine Therapy to the U.S.
Oh Boy, Chuck Schumer Faces More Backlash
Trump WH Hits Back at Boston Mayor’s Bold Defiance
Elon Musk Threatens to Sue Democrat ex-Rep Jamaal Bowman for Calling Him a...
'Deal With It': Fetterman Has Three Words for AOC
Hypocrite: CNN Turns on Gavin Newsom
Nice Try, MSNBC: Network Forced to Issue Another On-Air Apology After False Claims
Tipsheet

Iowa Judge Rules That the State's Fetal Heartbeat Abortion Law Is Unconstitutional

AP Photo/Teresa Crawford

An Iowa judge struck down a law Tuesday that prohibited abortion after the pre-born child’s heartbeat is detected – which typically occurs at roughly six weeks of pregnancy. The law would have been the earliest abortion ban in the country.

Advertisement

Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed the law in May and Planned Parenthood sued.

Judge Michael Huppert of the 5th Judicial District of Iowa, who temporarily blocked the measure in June, ruled in favor of Planned Parenthood and declared that the law was “violative of both the due process and equal protection provisions of the Iowa Constitution as not being narrowly tailored to serve the compelling state interest of promoting potential life.”

In his decision, he argued that fetal viability was what mattered in this case.

“Regardless of when precisely when a fetal heartbeat may be detected in a given pregnancy, it is undisputed that such cardiac activity is detectable well in advance of the fetus becoming viable,” he wrote.

“Viability is not only material to this case, it is dispositive on the present record,” he argued, referencing the Supreme Court’s language in Roe v. Wade.

Advertisement

“The court held that the state’s interest in promoting potential life may only be used to regulate (even to the point of proscription) postviability abortions,” he argued, “except where it is necessary in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother.”

Gov. Kim Reynolds released a statement Tuesday expressing her disappointment in the ruling.

“I am incredibly disappointed in today’s court ruling, because I believe that if death is determined when a heart stops beating, then a beating heart indicates life,” she said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement