Being Emotionally Incontinent Does Not Help
Trump Apparently Rules Out Military Action to Take Greenland
A GOP Senator's Stance on This Election Integrity Bill Is Quite the Gut...
Will Trump Invoke the Insurrection Act? He Gave His Answer Last Night.
LA Times Reported That ICE Busted Into Homes Without Warrants, Made Kids Cry....
Watch This Lefty Commentator Get Wrecked Over This Tweet About Palestinians and Hamas
Watch a Lib CNN Guest Walk Right Into a Trap Discussing the Ongoing...
NHS Nurse Wins Her Job Back After 'Misgendering' Male Patient
Check Out Justice Brown Jackson's Latest Judicial Word Salad
ICE Doesn’t Need Permission
The Reality of the Middle East
The Heritage Foundation Isn't Going Anywhere
Leftists Upset About Trump’s Second Term, but Not Biden’s Disastrous Reign
Maryland Proposes New Congressional Map to Cut Lone GOP Seat
Blood Is the Last Currency of Iran's Failing Theocracy
Tipsheet

Iowa Judge Rules That the State's Fetal Heartbeat Abortion Law Is Unconstitutional

AP Photo/Teresa Crawford

An Iowa judge struck down a law Tuesday that prohibited abortion after the pre-born child’s heartbeat is detected – which typically occurs at roughly six weeks of pregnancy. The law would have been the earliest abortion ban in the country.

Advertisement

Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed the law in May and Planned Parenthood sued.

Judge Michael Huppert of the 5th Judicial District of Iowa, who temporarily blocked the measure in June, ruled in favor of Planned Parenthood and declared that the law was “violative of both the due process and equal protection provisions of the Iowa Constitution as not being narrowly tailored to serve the compelling state interest of promoting potential life.”

In his decision, he argued that fetal viability was what mattered in this case.

“Regardless of when precisely when a fetal heartbeat may be detected in a given pregnancy, it is undisputed that such cardiac activity is detectable well in advance of the fetus becoming viable,” he wrote.

“Viability is not only material to this case, it is dispositive on the present record,” he argued, referencing the Supreme Court’s language in Roe v. Wade.

Advertisement

“The court held that the state’s interest in promoting potential life may only be used to regulate (even to the point of proscription) postviability abortions,” he argued, “except where it is necessary in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother.”

Gov. Kim Reynolds released a statement Tuesday expressing her disappointment in the ruling.

“I am incredibly disappointed in today’s court ruling, because I believe that if death is determined when a heart stops beating, then a beating heart indicates life,” she said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement