JD Vance's Office Corrects WSJ for Peddling Fake News About VP's Stance on...
I'm Shocked USA Today Allowed This Op-ed to Be Published About the Minneapolis...
Chicago Kids Can’t Read. The Chicago Teachers' Union Can’t Spell.
Consumers’ Research Flags Chubb’s Capitol Hill Push Against Litigation Finance
The Democrats' Pattern of Violence
Conservatives for Property Rights Urge White House Support for Patent Reform
Where's the Left's Outrage Over This Florida Shooting?
Stop Pretending That Colleges Are Nonprofit Institutions
Did You See the NYT Piece About the Death of Scott Adams?
Hegseth Vows to Slash Pentagon Bureaucracy and Unleash Tech Innovation Alongside Elon Musk
Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments on Men in Women’s Sports...and Hoo Boy
Federal Reserve Chairman ‘Ignored’ DOJ, Pirro Says, Necessitating Criminal Probe
Minnesota House Moves to Impeach Tim Walz
This Explosive New Ad Eviscerates Roy Cooper for Putting Illegals Behind the Wheel
The GOP Is Restoring the American Dream of Homeownership
Tipsheet

Supreme Court Passes on North Carolina Partisan Redistricting Case

The Supreme Court declined to take up a North Carolina case on partisan redistricting over a heavily Republican congressional map Monday. The high court struck down a lower court opinion invalidating the congressional maps and sent the case back down to a three judge panel in North Carolina to examine if Democratic voters had legal standing to challenge them in light of their recent opinion in a similar Wisconsin case.

Advertisement

In that case from Wisconsin last week, the justices ruled that the Wisconsin voters who sued over the Republican-drawn legislative districts did not prove they had legal standing to challenge them.

Unlike the Wisconsin case, however, the North Carolina lawsuit is from voters in each of the state’s congressional districts in addition to the Democratic Party.

The high court also punted on a redistricting case out of Maryland last Monday from GOP voters arguing the electoral map was unfairly drawn to favor Democrats. The justices sent that case back to the lower courts in an unsigned opinion.

In another ruling this Monday, the Supreme Court upheld Texas’s redistricting of electoral districts that a lower court had struck down as racially discriminatory. The high court ruled 5-4 that only one of the districts in the four counties in question was drawn with discriminatory intent.

Advertisement

Related:

NORTH CAROLINA

Justices Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Chief Justice John Roberts were in the majority in that ruling.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement