Congress's Mandate to Enact the President-Elect's Agenda
Latest LA Fires Update Will Likely Infuriate Voters
Wait, Did Joe Biden Just Crack a Joke About the LA Fires?
America and Europe Can Hang Together -- Or Hang Separately
Hot Takes on California's Disaster, David Muir's a Flaming Peacock, and We Hang...
Andrew Breitbart, Mark Zuckerberg and the Two-Way Politics-Culture Street
Don't Dismiss President-Elect Trump's Greenland Moves
Carter's Kindest Media Eulogists Were Rough on Reagan
Stopping Taxpayer-Funded Animal Torture Is As MAGA As It Gets
Sorry Mark Zuckerberg, We’ve Heard This All Before
There Is No Substitute for Strong Leadership
A Progressive Hellscape
DOGE and the Massive Deficit Problem
11th Circuit Appeals Court Makes a Decision on Release of Jack Smith's Report
Trump Responds After U.S. Supreme Court Denies Trump's Request to Block Sentencing
Tipsheet

Pro-life Groups Urge Congress to Add Hyde Protections Against Taxpayer Funding of Abortion to Tax Bill

The pro-life advocacy group March for Life Action threatened to score against the entire GOP spending bill Monday unless Hyde amendment protections are added to Obamacare plan cost-share reduction (CSR) bailouts ensuring that taxpayers will not fund abortion.

Advertisement

“Obamacare deviated from the longstanding Hyde amendment principle by funding insurance plans that cover abortion,” Thomas McClusky, Vice President of Government Affairs with March for Life Action, pointed out in a letter to Congress. “Because of that today hundreds of subsidized Obamacare plans currently cover abortion. Reinsurance and CSR payments will increase abortion coverage in healthcare by adding additional funding stream for these abortion-covering plans if they do not include Hyde- life protections.”

The Hyde Amendment is a spending rider that prohibits taxpayer funding of abortions except in cases of rape, incest or life of the mother, recognizing that many taxpayers might have moral objections to their money being used for abortions.

“The reinsurance and CSR effort under discussion also includes appropriating more than $21 billion in new funds over two years to subsidize plans, including those that cover elective abortion on the exchanges for over 1.2 million people,” McClusky added. “If such a bill does not explicitly include the Hyde Amendment protections, cost-sharing reduction payments to insurers will fund plans that cover abortion.”

“In other words, a pro-life Congress will have opened the doors to more taxpayer funding of abortion. March for Life Action is totally opposed to such an effort,” he emphasized. “If these healthcare bailout programs do not include Hyde-life protections, March for Life Action will score against the entire spending bill in our annual scorecard for the First Session of the 115th Congress.”

Advertisement

The pro-life Susan B. Anthony List issued a similar warning last week, saying it would oppose any spending bill that did not include Hyde amendment protections.

“The pro-life Republican Congress promised voters it would repeal and replace pro-abortion Obamacare, not prop it up,” SBA List President Marjorie Dannenfelser said. “SBA List will vigorously oppose any spending bill that includes Obamacare bailout funding that is not protected by the Hyde Amendment. Preventing taxpayer funding of abortion should be a bare minimum requirement for any new Obamacare spending advanced by a Republican Congress.” 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement