Here's What Led to That SLIGHT Uptick in the Inflation Report. Everyone Simmer...
Mike Johnson Wants Ghislaine Maxwell to Testify About Epstein List
WATCH: Police Footage Shows Arrest of Democrat State Lawmaker Who Burglarized Stepmother's...
These Gun Rights Groups Slapped a 'Big Beautiful Lawsuit' on the Government That...
Trump's Most Aggressive Immigration Policy Yet Just Dropped
Trump Targets UN Over Anti-Israel Bias—Commission Resigns in Wake
Rhode Island Democrat Smears ICE As ‘Nazi Gestapo Thugs’ for Arresting Illegal Alien
Trump Issues Ultimatum, Russia Yawns, EU Whines — Trump Fires Back
Dershowitz Says Trump Administration Is Not Hiding Epstein Files. Here's Who He Says...
Trump: AOC and Jasmine Crockett Are 'Low IQ'
Man Arrested at Atlanta Airport Trying to Smuggle $3M in Drugs to Brazil
How Melania Pushed Trump to Get Tough on Putin
Trump Champions Second Industrial Revolution in Pittsburgh
Bill Introduced to Designate Muslim Brotherhood a Terror Group
Epstein’s Former Cell Mate Shares His Thoughts on the ‘Suicide’ Narrative
Tipsheet

The Role of Money In the McConnell-Bevin Blowout

Mitch McConnell comfortably defeated Matt Bevin this week in the Senate GOP nomination primary in Kentucky. The Associated Press put it in an odd way, however, when they wrote:

Advertisement

Bevin spent $3.3 million in his bid as a political newcomer backed by various tea party groups. McConnell drowned him out with more than $9 million in spending. Outside groups spent millions more defending his conservative credentials.

Sure, Mitch McConnell and groups that supported him may have spent a lot on this primary campaign. But McConnell didn't exactly eke out a close race - he blew Bevin away, winning 60% to 35%.

The best research on the subject continues to show that money doesn't really matter all that much. A study from University of Chicago economist Steve Levitt found:

When a candidate doubled their spending, holding everything else constant, they only got an extra one percent of the popular vote. It’s the same if you cut your spending in half, you only lose one percent of the popular vote. So we’re talking about really large swings in campaign spending with almost trivial changes in the vote.

Advertisement

If this is true, McConnell (and associated groups) would have had to outspend Bevin tenfold to have turned a 50/50 race into the blowout that it is. While the numbers that AP cites are only official campaign spending, Bevin had outside groups like the Senate Conservatives Fund and FreedomWorks on his side as well. It's incredibly unlikely that McConnell's money was the sole key to his victory.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement