Jill Biden Is Still Supremely Angry With Nancy Pelosi
Despite Dem Theatrics, Expect Most of Trump's Nominees to Sail Through
George Will: Wildfires Are Going to Generate a Political Earthquake in California
TikTok Might Not Be Dead After All
Democrats Are Terrified of Kash Patel Leading the FBI. Perhaps They Should Be.
BREAKING: Ron DeSantis Announces Pick to Replace Marco Rubio in the Senate
'Millions of Dollars' Worth of Hunter Biden's Art Reportedly Destroyed in LA Fires
Collins Puts The New Yorker on Blast Over This Part of Hegseth Story
'Deeply Alarmed': Why Hundreds of WaPo Staffers Just Sent Bezos a Letter Calling...
Cuomo Disgusted by Dems' Questioning During Hegseth Hearing
Netanyahu Delays Cabinet Vote on Deal, Accuses Hamas of Creating 'Last Minute Crisis'
Why the Upcoming Deportations Will Increase American Confidence in Elections
The FDA Just Banned This Popular Food Dye
One Country Wants to Change Its Constitution to Revoke Citizenships
Lee Zeldin Lays Out How He'll Restore America's Energy Dominance As EPA Administrator
Tipsheet

Because If You Don't Agree With Democrats You're Heartless

The fight over Obamacare is over, but the fight over the way our health care system should work will not be over for a long time.

David Waldman over at The American Prospect attacks Congressman Roy Blunt for being against the Obamacare provision that prohibits private health insurance companies from pricing based on risk. The Lefty way of framing this is "discriminating based on pre-existing conditions." The middle-of-the-road way that I'll use is "community rating."

Advertisement

Because why should we do any favors for people who are irresponsible enough to get cancer? Damn freeloaders, thinking they ought to be able to buy health insurance.

Let's give Blunt some credit here. It would be easy, like other Republicans do, to pretend that you can outlaw denials for preexisting conditions without having an individual mandate. Blunt won't do that -- because he knows that a person with a pre-existing condition is nothing more than a health scofflaw.

Waldman and I can agree on one thing: you can't have a mandate without community rating, and you can't have community rating without a mandate. Disaster ensues without these things working in conjunction.

But his claim is that "if you don't support Obamacare, you don't care about sick people!" This is an irresponsible emotional argument that is not the way that serious people discuss serious issues.

There are many proposals that have emanated from the Right throughout the health care fight. I have some concerns about many of our ways of dealing with pre-existing conditions, but I'm willing to listen. I'm not, one to throw around ridiculous emotional arguments about what are serious issues, or willing to paint my intellectual opponents as cold-hearted compassionless monsters, which is what the Left was reduced to in their Obamacare campaign.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement