Oh, So That's Why DOJ Isn't Going After Pro-Terrorism Agitators
The UN Endorses a Second Terrorist State for Iran
The Stormy Daniels Trial Was Always Going to Be a Circus. It's Reached...
Biden Administration Hurls Israel Under the Bus Again
Israeli Ambassador Shreds the U.N. Charter in Powerful Speech Before Vote to Grant...
MSNBC Is Pro-Adult Film Testimony
The Long Haul of Love
Here's Where Speaker Mike Johnson Stands on Abortion
Trump Addresses the Very Real Chance of Him Going to Jail
Yes, Jen Psaki Really Said This About Biden Cutting Off Weapons Supply to...
3,000 Fulton County Ballots Were Scanned Twice During the 2020 Election Recount
Joe Biden's Weapons 'Pause' Will Get More Israeli Soldiers, Civilians Killed
Left-Wing Mayor Hires Drag Queen to Spearhead 'Transgender Initiatives'
NewsNation Border Patrol Ride Along Sees Arrest of Illegal Immigrants in Illustration of...
One State Just Cut Off Funding for Planned Parenthood
Tipsheet

Because If You Don't Agree With Democrats You're Heartless

The fight over Obamacare is over, but the fight over the way our health care system should work will not be over for a long time.

David Waldman over at The American Prospect attacks Congressman Roy Blunt for being against the Obamacare provision that prohibits private health insurance companies from pricing based on risk. The Lefty way of framing this is "discriminating based on pre-existing conditions." The middle-of-the-road way that I'll use is "community rating."

Advertisement

Because why should we do any favors for people who are irresponsible enough to get cancer? Damn freeloaders, thinking they ought to be able to buy health insurance.

Let's give Blunt some credit here. It would be easy, like other Republicans do, to pretend that you can outlaw denials for preexisting conditions without having an individual mandate. Blunt won't do that -- because he knows that a person with a pre-existing condition is nothing more than a health scofflaw.

Waldman and I can agree on one thing: you can't have a mandate without community rating, and you can't have community rating without a mandate. Disaster ensues without these things working in conjunction.

But his claim is that "if you don't support Obamacare, you don't care about sick people!" This is an irresponsible emotional argument that is not the way that serious people discuss serious issues.

There are many proposals that have emanated from the Right throughout the health care fight. I have some concerns about many of our ways of dealing with pre-existing conditions, but I'm willing to listen. I'm not, one to throw around ridiculous emotional arguments about what are serious issues, or willing to paint my intellectual opponents as cold-hearted compassionless monsters, which is what the Left was reduced to in their Obamacare campaign.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement