Joe Scarborough Really Stretched the Limits of Sanity With This Take on the...
Fiasco: NYC GOP Councilwoman Just Obliterated Mamdani Over the City's Shambolic Winter Sto...
CBS News Peddled Fake News About Bad Bunny and ICE Post-Super Bowl Performance
Yes, This Was the Best Response to John Kasich's Tweet About the Super...
A Bar Patron Had a Total Meltdown During the Super Bowl. The Reason...
Maybe We Should Be Glad Bad Bunny Performed in Spanish
Notice Where This Ex-ESPN Reporter's Attempt to Mock Conservatives Over Bad Bunny Laughabl...
Why Are Americans Fleeing Blue States for Red States?
Deadline Tries to Guilt Trip John Lithgow for Starring in HBO's 'Harry Potter'...
Mayor Mamdani Becomes First NYC Leader to Skip Archbishop Installation in Almost a...
Is There Any Good News Out There?
When Canadians Were Actually Funny
The Student ICE Walkouts Are a Troubling Reminder of How Revolutionaries Are Made
America’s Security Doesn’t End at the Ice’s Edge
Talks About Talks: How Tehran Is Buying Time While Washington Hesitates
Tipsheet

Guys, Medicare's Bankruptcy is No Big Deal

Washington Post wunderkind Ezra Klein thinks that Medicare is, like, an awesome program that may be driving us bankrupt, but in the process of driving us bankrupt, will help reign in our health care costs! Come again?

Advertisement

Medicare is going broke. It will bankrupt us. Case closed! Except for one thing:

So will private-sector health care.

The story here is simple. You've heard it a thousand times. Health-care costs are growing more quickly than wages or GDP growth. Much more quickly, in fact. If that trend isn't arrested, there's only one outcome: Costs will overwhelm us. That's true for Medicare and true for the rest of the health-care system.

The relevant question, then, is not whether Medicare will bankrupt us, but will it do so more quickly than private health-care insurance?

...Medicare's rate of spending will bankrupt us, but more slowly than private health insurance. Which would give us more time to figure out a fix.

This is not the relevant question. As has been well-catalogued, Americans' private health care spending has risen in conjunction with the percentage of their incomes spent on other life necessities (food, housing) has been precipitously dropping. Medicare's costs have been skyrocketing and are projected to overwhelm us at the same time that most other sectors of government spending are doing the same thing.

Advertisement

Related:

HEALTH CARE

The other relevant question that immediately pops to mind is: whose behavior is more likely to change? Politicians who have a sweet handout program to an important voting bloc that don't want to see their benefits cut? Or private persons who will sit at home and see that no, they shouldn't get an MRI when they feel like they're coming down with a case of the sniffles? (Example has been exaggerated for effect.)

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos