Why the Latest Story From the Epstein Files Could Give Trump Grounds for...
Notice Where and When This CNN Panel on Immigration Fell Apart
I’m a Racist, He’s a Racist, She’s a Racist, Wouldn’t You Like to...
There's Nothing 'Gorgeous' About Socialism
Chicago's Brandon Johnson Say's There's No Evidence a Corporate Head Tax Is a...
Pastor Urges Christians and Jews to Unite Against Rising Antisemitism
Who Are We in Their Presence?
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 298: It’s ‘Messiah’ Time Again
Why Leftist Film Societies Cancelled Nuremburg
2 Dead, 8 Wounded in Brown University Shooting
The Season Was Made for Remembering
America’s Foster Care Crisis Demands a Return to Faith, Family, and Community
A Call to Remember the Persecuted Christians
Restoring a Generation’s Love for Faith and Country
Ypres, Human Rights Day, and Iran's Martyrs: Why Memory Is a Moral Duty
Tipsheet

Federal Court Allows Challenge to Obamacare

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia denied the Obama administration’s motion to dismiss Virginia’s lawsuit against Obamacare. Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli filed one of the three major lawsuits against President Obama’s healthcare law, focusing on the issue that the individual mandate, requiring every American to purchase health insurance, is unconstitutional.

Advertisement

For the reason my coauthor and I explained in the Wall Street Journal in January and last month, the Obamacare individual mandate is clearly unconstitutional. In researching this issue for our book, The Blueprint: Obama’s Plan to Subvert the Constitution and Build an Imperial Presidency, Ken Blackwell and I found that commanding Americans to buy insurance is not authorized by even the most liberal precedents of the Supreme Court interpreting the Commerce Clause, the Taxing and Spending Clause, or the General Welfare Clause.

The U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services (HHS) hoped to make quick work of this lawsuit by getting it dismissed. HHS argued both that Virginia lacks standing to bring this lawsuit, and that the lawsuit was not ripe for court consideration. Judge Henry Hudson disagreed in a 32-page decision.

This is only the beginning of the fight. All today’s ruling means that the lawsuit can go forward. But this was the first battle in the constitutional war to enforce the plain meaning of the Constitution.

Advertisement

Related:

HEALTH CARE

So today was a victory for the rule of law, as it repudiates the overbearing policies of an imperial presidency by enforcing the provisions of the Constitution. May it be the first of many as Americans seek to reclaim their constitutional rights.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos