What Happened in Minneapolis Is Part of the Left's Plan
Democrats Want Blood and They Aren’t Ever Going to Stop
Press Covers the Offensive Fashion Choices of ICE, and the Acceptable Sexism Toward...
The Wrong Narrative
A Once-in-a-Lifetime Teachable Moment
Holocaust Remembrance Day: Not Just Memory — A Call to Moral Courage
No Snow Day for NYC Kids
Sunday Morning Worship Should Not Require an Escape Plan
Protest, Aggression, and Self-Defense
How a Texas Judge Hurt Kids and Helped Big Tech
It Looks Like Budweiser Learned Their Lesson After This New Ad Dropped
The Antifa Crossdresser Who Urged Followers to Take Up Arms Against ICE Is...
Virginia Democrats Have a New Plan on How to Lock Up Gun Owners
Another Wave of Venezuelan Gang Members Just Got Busted In an ATM Hacking...
This Texas University Got Caught Spending Millions on Foreign Labor
Tipsheet

Federal Court Allows Challenge to Obamacare

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia denied the Obama administration’s motion to dismiss Virginia’s lawsuit against Obamacare. Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli filed one of the three major lawsuits against President Obama’s healthcare law, focusing on the issue that the individual mandate, requiring every American to purchase health insurance, is unconstitutional.

Advertisement

For the reason my coauthor and I explained in the Wall Street Journal in January and last month, the Obamacare individual mandate is clearly unconstitutional. In researching this issue for our book, The Blueprint: Obama’s Plan to Subvert the Constitution and Build an Imperial Presidency, Ken Blackwell and I found that commanding Americans to buy insurance is not authorized by even the most liberal precedents of the Supreme Court interpreting the Commerce Clause, the Taxing and Spending Clause, or the General Welfare Clause.

The U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services (HHS) hoped to make quick work of this lawsuit by getting it dismissed. HHS argued both that Virginia lacks standing to bring this lawsuit, and that the lawsuit was not ripe for court consideration. Judge Henry Hudson disagreed in a 32-page decision.

This is only the beginning of the fight. All today’s ruling means that the lawsuit can go forward. But this was the first battle in the constitutional war to enforce the plain meaning of the Constitution.

Advertisement

Related:

HEALTH CARE

So today was a victory for the rule of law, as it repudiates the overbearing policies of an imperial presidency by enforcing the provisions of the Constitution. May it be the first of many as Americans seek to reclaim their constitutional rights.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement