America Is Back: Team USA Sweeps Canada to Take Home Gold in Milan
Democrats Are Obsessed With White Men
A Tale of Two Athletes
America Keeps Winning
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 308: ‘Fear Not' New Testament – Part 3
Iran Did Not Get the Memo
Byron Donalds Blasts Zohran Mamdani Over ‘Impossible’ Free Bus and Grocery Store Plan
TSA PreCheck Still Active During Partial Government Shutdown
Arizona Advances Bill to Rename a Highway After Charlie Kirk. Will the State's...
Secret Service Kill Armed Man Who Broke Into Mar-a-Lago
An Ambitious Bible-Reading Plan
Family As Communion: Familiaris Consortio
Who Wins in the Trump Economy? American Families!
President Trump Is Running a Tight Ship and Giving the Deep State a...
New York City Cannot Afford Democratic Socialism
Tipsheet

Biden Administration Vows to Reinstate Censorship Regime

Biden Administration Vows to Reinstate Censorship Regime
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

After the Supreme Court failed 6-3 Thursday to address the federal government's vast online censorship regime the Biden administration, which was previously ordered by a federal judge to stop all communication with big tech companies, is vowing to reinstate their practice of controlling information on the internet. 

Advertisement

"The Supreme Court’s decision is the right one, and it helps ensure the Biden Administration can continue our important work with technology companies to protect the safety and security of the American people, after years of extreme and unfounded Republican attacks on public officials who engaged in critical work to keep Americans safe," White House Press Secretary Karine Jean Pierre released in a statement. 

In the dissent Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, warned about the consequences of the Court's ruling. 

"This is one of the most important free speech cases to reach this Court in years. Freedom of speech serves many valuable purposes, but its most important role is protection of speech that is essential to democratic self-government," Alito wrote. 

"We are obligated to tackle the free speech issue that the case presents. The Court, however, shirks that duty and thus permits the successful campaign of coercion in this case to stand as an attractive model for future officials who want to control what the people say, hear, and think. That is regrettable," he continued. "And because of the perpetrators’ high positions, it was even more dangerous. It was blatantly unconstitutional, and the country may come to regret the Court’s failure to say so...If a coercive campaign is carried out with enough sophistication, it may get by. That is not a message this Court should send."

Advertisement

Here's a preview of what to expect from the White House now that their power to censor has been reinstated. 

This is exactly why we need you on our team as a VIP member. To be able to tell the truth free of the shackles of Big Tech and Biden censorship, we need the direct support of our loyal readers. Join here and take advantage of our limited-time 60% off sale!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement