This Podcast Interview Only Reminds Us How Lucky We Are That Trump Beat...
What If Dems Are Shut Out of the CA Gov Race? Newsom Says...
Appeals Court Blocks Trump Settlement to E. Jean Carroll...for Now
Maryland Might Revive Gerrymander Push, but There Are a Couple Problems
Variety Gets Wrecked for Attacking Critics of the 'Diverse' Cast of Nolan's Odyssey
Democrats Khanna and Tlaib Sponsor Resolution That Backs Global Anti-Israel 'Nakba 78' Pro...
America Has a Serious Literacy Problem on Its Hands
President Trump Bids Farewell to China
The NYPD Is Investigating Another Antisemitic Incident at NYU
'See You in Court:' DOJ Sues Virginia Over Assault Weapons Ban
Leftists Fall for Mamdani's NYC Budget Deficit Lies
Can-Do Nation
Chaos in Beijing: Secret Service, American Reporters Clash With Chinese Security During Tr...
The Biden Administration Is to Blame for Spirit’s Demise
America Just Told the UN to Pound Sand on Replacement Migration
Tipsheet

NRA Scores Big Win at the Supreme Court

NRA Scores Big Win at the Supreme Court
National Rifle Association

The National Rifle Association scored a win at the Supreme Court Thursday when justices ruled 9-0 the Second Amendment organization's First Amendment lawsuit against financial regulators in New York can move forward. The NRA sued New York after former Superintendent of the New York Department of Financial Services Maria Vullo - under pressure from New York Attorney General Letitia James - pressured private financial institutions not to do business with the group with threats of government regulation. The ruling reverses a Second Circuit decision stating Vullo's actions "constituted permissible government speech and legitimate law enforcement." 

Advertisement

The NRA argued Vullo "violated the First Amendment by coercing DFS-regulated parties to punish or suppress the NRA’s gun-promotion advocacy." 

"Six decades ago, this Court held that a government entity’s 'threat of invoking legal sanctions and other means of coercion' against a third party 'to achieve the suppression' of disfavored speech violates the First Amendment," Justice Sonja Sotomayor wrote in the unanimous opinion. "Today, the Court reaffirms what it said then: Government officials cannot attempt to coerce private parties in order to punish or suppress views that the government disfavors. Petitioner National Rifle Association (NRA) plausibly alleges that respondent Maria Vullo did just that. As superintendent of the New York Department of Financial Services, Vullo allegedly pressured regulated entities to help her stifle the NRA’s pro-gun advocacy by threatening enforcement actions against those entities that refused to disassociate from the NRA and other gun-promotion advocacy groups. Those allegations, if true, state a First Amendment claim." 

"The Court holds that the NRA plausibly alleged that Vullo violated the First Amendment by coercing DFS-regulated entities to terminate their business relationships with the NRA in order to punish or suppress the NRA’s advocacy," Sotomayor continued. "The judgment of the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated, and the case remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion."

Advertisement

Related:

SECOND AMENDMENT



Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement