Well, the NYT Caved and Omitted This Serious Allegation Against Graham Platner
Platner Accuser Blasts New York Times for Watering Down Her Story to Help...
ACLJ Joins Client – Family of School Shooting Survivor – in Condemning Roblox...
Looks Like Democrats Don't 'Believe All Women' Anymore
Obama-Appointed Judge Faces Impeachment for Having Loud Sexual Encounters in Her Chambers
Van Jones Has a Stark Warning for Democrats After Allegations Against Graham Platner
Lefty Bitterly Admits President Trump's Reflecting Pool Looks Good
Despite the 'Wrong and Toxic' Allegations Against Graham Platner, He's Still Ro Khanna's...
Johnathan Turley Weighs In on CA's Election Chaos
Rep. Ro Khanna to Attend Rally Alongside Graham Platner Despite Bombshell NYT Report
US Attorney Launches Sweeping Election Fraud Probe in California
Prediction Markets Are Flashing Warning Signs for California Primary Races
Judge Orders Trump Admin to Resume Asylum and Immigration Processing
This State Just Surpassed California to Become the New Capital for Fortune 500...
Trump Just Got the Last Laugh on Immigration
Tipsheet

NRA Scores Big Win at the Supreme Court

NRA Scores Big Win at the Supreme Court
National Rifle Association

The National Rifle Association scored a win at the Supreme Court Thursday when justices ruled 9-0 the Second Amendment organization's First Amendment lawsuit against financial regulators in New York can move forward. The NRA sued New York after former Superintendent of the New York Department of Financial Services Maria Vullo - under pressure from New York Attorney General Letitia James - pressured private financial institutions not to do business with the group with threats of government regulation. The ruling reverses a Second Circuit decision stating Vullo's actions "constituted permissible government speech and legitimate law enforcement." 

Advertisement

The NRA argued Vullo "violated the First Amendment by coercing DFS-regulated parties to punish or suppress the NRA’s gun-promotion advocacy." 

"Six decades ago, this Court held that a government entity’s 'threat of invoking legal sanctions and other means of coercion' against a third party 'to achieve the suppression' of disfavored speech violates the First Amendment," Justice Sonja Sotomayor wrote in the unanimous opinion. "Today, the Court reaffirms what it said then: Government officials cannot attempt to coerce private parties in order to punish or suppress views that the government disfavors. Petitioner National Rifle Association (NRA) plausibly alleges that respondent Maria Vullo did just that. As superintendent of the New York Department of Financial Services, Vullo allegedly pressured regulated entities to help her stifle the NRA’s pro-gun advocacy by threatening enforcement actions against those entities that refused to disassociate from the NRA and other gun-promotion advocacy groups. Those allegations, if true, state a First Amendment claim." 

"The Court holds that the NRA plausibly alleged that Vullo violated the First Amendment by coercing DFS-regulated entities to terminate their business relationships with the NRA in order to punish or suppress the NRA’s advocacy," Sotomayor continued. "The judgment of the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated, and the case remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion."

Advertisement

Related:

SECOND AMENDMENT



Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement