MS NOW Shows It Is on Shaky Ground; Lawrence O'Donnell Has Some Odd...
Jeff Bezos' Ex Wife Just Proved Wealth Confiscation Doesn't Work
A Forensic Expert in Colorado Just Pleaded Guilty to Mishandling Data in Dozens...
After Dobbs, Will We Get Life Right on America’s 250th?
The Meaning of America
Two Venezuelan Illegal Aliens Sentenced to Over 6 Years for ATM Jackpotting Scheme...
Whitmer's $1.8 Billion Jobs Plan Delivers 602 Jobs — and a $3 Million...
Trump's Latest D.C. Restoration Is Going To Be Huge
House Set to Pass SAVE America Act for Fourth Time, Johnson Says
John Kasich Is Back and Worse Than Ever
RFK Jr., Dr. Oz: Over 1 Million Enrolled in Obamacare With No Social...
The WNBA's Coordinated Campaign Against Caitlin Clark Is Obvious
Wait, This LA Reporter Was Forced to Apologize After Rooting for Team USA?
U.S. and Iran Exchange New Set of Strikes Just Two Weeks After Peace...
Passing Faith onto the Next Generation
Tipsheet

Another Big Lie About Israel Just Spread Like Wildfire

Another Big Lie About Israel Just Spread Like Wildfire
AP Photo/Sebastian Scheiner, Pool

Over the weekend the Israeli Defense Forces issued a precision strike on two Hamas leaders in the southern Gaza city of Rafah. After a fire broke out, which moved into a refugee tent, the global media and "international community" rushed to claim the IDF purposely bombed a humanitarian safe zone - killing dozens of women and children. 

Advertisement

For days this claim continued after a botched translation of remarks made by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 

Given the IDF's history of taking painstaking steps to avoid civilian casualties, of course it wasn't true. The fire occurred because Hamas, in typical fashion, stored munitions next to the humanitarian tents. From former Jerusalem Post editor Avi Mayer: 

The facts about the Israeli airstrike in Rafah and the fire that followed are starting to become clear, and they totally change the story:

◾️ The Israeli airstrike that targeted senior Hamas commanders in Rafah was more than a mile away from the safe zone for Palestinian civilians and more than 550 feet away from shelters Hamas had falsely claimed were targeted in the incident

◾️ The munitions used were the smallest possible: two warheads of 37 lbs each, far smaller than what other Western militaries use in comparable situations

◾️ The munitions could not themselves have ignited a fire of the size that resulted in the deaths of Palestinian civilians, indicating that Hamas weapons stored in or near the targeted structure—of which the IDF was unaware—may have exploded and caused the fire

◾️ Footage of the scene taken by Palestinians and uploaded to social media platforms appears to show secondary explosions, further indicating the presence of weapons in the area

◾️ A phone call within Gaza intercepted by Israeli intelligence contained the admission that the structure targeted by the airstrike served as an ammunition warehouse, that secondary explosions took place, and that the Israeli airstrike wasn't powerful enough to have ignited the fire

◾️ Hamas has been operating from the area since October 7; a rocket launcher used to fire rockets into Israel was located 150 feet from the targeted structure, suggesting that additional weapons were likely stored nearby and may have caused the fire

While none of this makes the heartbreaking results of the fire any less dreadful, it does call into question a lot of the reporting surrounding this tragic incident, which appears to have been based on false information put out by Hamas, rather than the facts on the ground.

You'd think news organizations would learn. 

You'd be wrong.

Advertisement

Related:

TERRORISM

More corroboration:

The White House hinted earlier this week there was no deliberate strike on the camp and urged reporters to wait for an investigation to conclude.


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement