It’s Their Own Fault We No Longer Default to Respect
There Was a Horrific School Shooting in Canada...and Their Police Used a Weird...
Person of Interest Arrested in Connection to the Abduction of Nancy Guthrie
Fraud Nation
Technological Sweet Spot
Public Opinion: A Tyrant Against Hard Decisions
Peggy Noonan Loses Her Noodle Over Washington Post Layoffs
Misconduct Rampant: America’s Leaders Increasingly Prioritize Agendas Over Fairness, Laws
Pass the SAVE America Act
Trump's DOJ Seeks Justice for Victims of Benghazi
2026 Olympics: Let’s Talk About Crotch Scandals
The Washington Post Is Paying the Bill for Free Speech
Republicans Siding With Big Banks in Stablecoin Fight Could Tank Trump’s Affordability Age...
Freezing Deaths, Garbage Piles in Largest Sanctuary City
Woke DC Grand Jury Denies Indictments of Six Democrats Accused of Sedition
Tipsheet

Justice Jackson Says the 'Most Horrible Thing I've Ever Heard' About the First Amendment

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Murthy v. Missouri. At the center of the case is the federal government's coercing of social media companies to take down stories and content bureaucrats deemed "misinformation" during the COVID-19 pandemic. This type of censorship was repeatedly touted by the Biden White House. 

Advertisement

During arguments, liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson came to the defense of the government and expressed concern the case would limit federal power. 

Jackson's claims about the First Amendment didn't sit well with constitutional scholars, including Republican Senator Eric Schmitt. Schmitt brought the case against the Biden administration when he served as Missouri's attorney general.

Advertisement

Related:

CENSORSHIP

The White House is refusing to comment on the case and whether officials are still in touch with social media companies about censoring information. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement