The One Dem No One Is Going to Miss If He Loses Next...
This GOP Rep Had a Simple Question for the American Bar Association. It...
Special Counsel Jack Smith Is Referred for Criminal Prosecution. Here's Why.
After the Arizona Primaries, Total Fury Erupts Over Establishment Dems' Election Meddling
Secret Service Director Says Threats Against Trump and Other Protectees Are 'Off the...
So That's Why Some Crazed Migrant Executed Three People in Minnesota?
An Officer-Involved Shooting in Madison Revealed the Dangerous Anti-Cop Agenda of WI Democ...
Is ActBlue Helping Fund Abdul El-Sayed's Campaign With Fake Donors?
The WI Democratic Primary Just Went Completely Off the Rails
The Left Will Never Understand 'Shall Not Be Infringed'
Mike Waltz Just Made a Fool of This WI Congressman and His Defense...
A Bunch of Democrats Joined a Livestream Where the DSA Attacked America and...
Mamdani Was Asked About Arresting Hamas War Criminals, and His Answer Was Revealing
James Talarico Continues Pandering to Voters, This Time by Supporting Reparations
Houthis Attacked Oil Tankers – That's Not Flying With Trump
Tipsheet

Trump Responds to Special Counsel Efforts to Obtain a Gag Order

Trump Responds to Special Counsel Efforts to Obtain a Gag Order
AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

President Donald Trump is responding to a recent filing from Special Counsel Jack Smith requesting a gag order against him in the January 6 case. 

"Deranged Jack Smith’s Gag Order request would make it impossible for me to speak negatively about Crooked Joe Biden, and other subjects of incompetence. How Ridiculous! No more FIRST AMENDMENT?" Trump wrote on Truth Social Tuesday. 

Advertisement

Late last week news broke that Smith requested the gag order from U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan. Smith claimed it was "narrowly tailored," when in reality, it cast a very wide net. 

"On Friday afternoon, U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan unsealed filings revealing the government’s week-old request, arguing that Trump is undermining the fairness of the proceedings through “disparaging and inflammatory attacks” on prosecutors, witnesses and the judge in the case," POLITICO first reported.

Advertisement

Related:

2024 ELECTION

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement