Seattle's Socialist Mayor Has One Word for High-Earners Fleeing the City
The Democrats' Abortion Lies Have Caused Widespread Damage
Humans. Americans. Let Everyone Be Treated Equally.
Future GOP Presidential Nominees Must Endure Severe Storms
Jet Ski, New Home, and Food Stamps: Minnesota Business Owner Charged With SNAP...
Four Green Card Holders Charged With Illegal Voting in New Jersey Federal Elections
Elizabeth Warren Killed Spirit Airlines and Now She’s Complaining About It
California Man Sentenced to 12 Years for $59M COVID Unemployment Fraud Scheme
This Oklahoma Man Who Threatened to Kill ICE Agents Is Going to Face...
Spirit Airlines Just Shut Down. Here's Trump's Relief Plan for Air Travel.
You Are on Your Own in America's Progressive Cities
Biden’s Ill-Advised Rule Against Critical Minerals Mining Is Finally Gone
Socialist Cognitive Dissonance: Our Revolution Endorses Billionaire Tom Steyer for Califor...
The Social Media Age Is Over, but America Can Still Lead on Tech
Has Iran’s Ceasefire Become a Green Light for Repression?
Tipsheet

Garland Cornered Over Special Counsel Contradictions on Hunter Biden

Garland Cornered Over Special Counsel Contradictions on Hunter Biden
AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta

Before the announcement of Hunter Biden's sweetheart plea deal in June, which has since completely fallen apart, Attorney General Merrick Garland assured the public Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss had all of the tools he needed to thoroughly investigate Biden and bring charges. After five years and after blowing through statutes of limitations, Weiss struck a highly unusual and unprecedented deal -- giving Biden two misdemeanors and a diversion program for what should have been felony tax and firearm charges. IRS whistleblowers testified the case was improperly handled and that political influence was at play. 

Advertisement

Two months later and after the deal fell apart in court, Attorney General Merrick Garland elevated Weiss to Special Counsel with a the task of investigating Hunter Biden. 

The move raised serious questions about Garland's previous claims Weiss already had the tools he needed for an unobstructed investigation. Now, Congress wants to know more about the contradiction and about-face. 

"Your appointment raises numerous concerns considering earlier statements from you and Mr. Weiss that Mr. Weiss already had “ultimate” authority—free of any political pressure—to pursue the investigation where, when, and how he sought fit. Now, recently reported information raises additional concerns about the Department’s unusual actions in this matter, and suggests that the Department under your leadership has been attempting to circumvent the rule of law in favor of Hunter Biden, President Biden, and the Biden family. Given the extremely serious nature of these issues, the Committees expect unfettered cooperation with our oversight from both you and the Department," House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, House Oversight and Accountability Committee Chairman James Comer and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith wrote in a letter to Garland Monday. 

Advertisement

Related:

HUNTER BIDEN

"Since the early days of its investigation concerning Hunter Biden, DOJ has deviated from its standard investigative procedure and afforded Hunter Biden special privileges not afforded to other Americans," they said.  

"These deviations took place while Mr. Weiss, with the full support and backing of the Department, oversaw the Hunter Biden investigation as U.S. Attorney—prior to receiving special counsel status. The Department pulled punches in this investigation, handicapping veteran investigators and preventing them from freely pursuing the facts," the letter continues. "The Department agreed to an apparently unprecedented plea deal with Hunter Biden after his attorneys threatened to call his father, President Biden, as a witness in the case. Now you have appointed as special counsel an individual who oversaw all the investigation’s irregularities, who spent the past two months claiming that he did not need special counsel status, and who was responsible for the plea agreement that collapsed in court and is widely viewed as an embarrassment for the Department. In light of Mr. Weiss’s record leading this investigation, we have concerns with his appointment as special counsel."

Advertisement

Jordan, Comer and Smith have requested a number of documents related to communication about Weiss' Special Counsel appointment by September 11, 2023. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement