The Liberal Media Reaction to This Second Trump Assassination Attempt Is What You'd...
BREAKING: We Have a Major Update on the Shooting at Trump International Golf...
Sister-in-Law, Twin of House Dem Candidate Have Wild Responses to Assassination Attempt Ag...
MSNBC Blames Second Attempted Trump Assassination on... Trump
FBI Grilled On Why Secret Service Wasn't Surrounding Trump at Time of 2nd...
Here’s What Top Dem Posted About 'Extreme MAGA Republicans' After Shots Fired Near...
Second Trump Shooter Has Been Identified
RFK Jr. Has a Warning for Biden If He Gives Into Ukraine's Demands
Here Come the 'Not to Expect Results on Election Night' Headlines
Trump Announces He Is 'Safe and Well' After After 2nd Assassination Attempt On...
CNN Accuses Those Saying that Springfield Is Being Overrun, 'Dehumanizes' Immigrants
Kamala’s Got Another New Accent
Military Members Fact-Checked Kamala Harris In Brutal Takedown
Democrat Running for Top House Seat in NY Claims 'We Never' Had Open...
Trump's Latest Tax Cut Proves to Be Popular Among Voters
Tipsheet

Is Prince Harry in the U.S. Illegally?

AP Photo/Peter Dejong, File

The Department of Homeland Security is refusing to properly comply with a Freedom of Information Act request pertaining to the lawful or unlawful entry of Prince Harry (Duke of Sussex) into the United States. Harry -- a British citizen -- currently lives in California with his wife, Meghan, and is raking in millions of dollars through deals brokered in America. DHS is refusing to detail whether Harry lied about past substance abuse in order to obtain a visa. 

Advertisement

"This week The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) refused to confirm or deny whether or not they had records relating to the Duke of Sussex requesting a waiver in order to lawfully enter the country.  This response to The Heritage Foundation’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request shows an appalling lack of transparency by the Biden Administration," the Heritage Foundation, whose attorneys filed the FOIA with DHS, released in a statement this week. 

"There are only three possible ways in which the Duke of Sussex could have entered the United States on a visa: (1) Prince Harry disclosed the full extent of his drug use and received a waiver; (2) DHS blatantly ignored the law; or (3) Prince Harry lied on oath," the statement continues. "The Department of Homeland Security’s efforts to stonewall the Heritage Foundation’s Freedom of Information request are unacceptable, and we will be contesting their position."

In their refusal to provide information about the immigration records, DHS officials cite the need to protect the privacy of the former royal. Heritage is calling this claim preposterous, pointing out a waiver for Harry's entry into the country would have been required to comply with the law or, "the government blatantly ignored the law in Prince Harry’s case." 

"We expected to have to fight every step of this case in federal court and will continue to press for transparency and accountability for the American people. Ultimately the release of Prince Harry’s US immigration records will be decided in federal court by a federal judge. We are determined to prevail in a matter of clear public interest, on an important issue that matters to the American people: the application and enforcement of America’s immigration laws without fear or favor," Heritage vows. 

Advertisement










Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement