There's an Update on the Kind of Classified Information Biden Mishandled
Biden's Top Health Official Gives Sickening Answer When Asked a Simple Question on...
BREAKING: Senate Dems Torpedo Mayorkas Impeachment
Google Doesn’t Want You to Read This
The Post-O.J. Verdict Paradise
‘Our Constitution Was Made Only for a Moral and Religious People,’ Part II
Netanyahu's 9-Word Warning to Terrorist-Backed Iran
Columbia University President Responds to Claims of Anti-Semitism on Campus
House Has 'Sole Power of Impeachment': Comer Issues Key Reminder to WH Over...
Law Enforcement Officials Reveal How Biden’s Policies Enable Criminal Illegal Aliens
Biden's Speech in Scranton Was Full of Some Pretty Bad Moments
Thank you, John Sterling
More Than 100 Illegal Aliens Cut Through Wire Installed by National Guard to...
Is It 'Obvious' That Biden Is 'Bringing People Together?'
Court Overturns State Law Protecting Women's Sports From 'Transgender' Athletes

Jim Jordan Blasts Potential Gag Order Against Trump

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan and House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer are blasting reports President Donald Trump may be subject to a gag order after being arranged on at least 30 charges in New York City Tuesday. 


"We are deeply concerned by reports the New York District Attorney may seek an unconstitutional gag order. To put any restrictions on the ability of President Trump to discuss his mistreatment at the hands of this politically motivated prosecutor would only further demonstrate the weaponization of the New York justice system," Jordan and Comer released in a statement. "To even contemplate stifling the speech of the former commander in chief and current candidate for President is at odds with everything America stands for."

After Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg officially announced the indictment of Trump late last week, Jordan and Comer issued demands he testify on Capitol Hill about the politically motivated investigation. They're also vowing to pull federal funding used by the office. 

"Your decision to pursue such a politically motivated prosecution—while adopting progressive criminal justice policies that allow career 'criminals [to] run the streets' of Manhattan—requires congressional scrutiny about how public safety funds appropriated by Congress are implemented by local law-enforcement agencies. In addition, your apparent decision to pursue criminal charges where federal authorities declined to do so requires oversight to inform potential legislative reforms about the delineation of prosecutorial authority between federal and local officials," they wrote in a letter to Bragg. "Finally, because the circumstances of this matter stem, in part, from Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation, Congress may consider legislative reforms to the authorities of special counsels and their relationships with other prosecuting entities." 


Bragg is refusing to do so. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos