CBP and ICE Chiefs Faced Off Against Unhinged Dems...and Some Said the Quiet...
Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has Been Telling Some Weird Lies About His Ancestor and...
DOJ Charges Two Men in $120 Million Adult Day Care Fraud Scheme
This GOP Governor Just Shot Down a Bill That Would Have Banned Biological...
This Is How Mike Johnson Will Stop Lawmakers From Challenging Trump's Tariffs
National Nurses Union Calls for the Abolition of ICE
While Her Senate Rivals Campaign Statewide, Haley Stevens Hides From Voters
Wisconsin High School Is Hosting a Drag Show. Guess Who's Participating.
You Are the Carbon They Want to Reduce: WEF 'Sustainability' Leftist Wants to...
FBI Releases Images of Suspect in Nancy Guthrie Kidnapping
Dow 50,000: A Supply-Side Miracle
Mike Johnson Blasts Mamdani's DOH for Creating a ‘Global Oppression’ Group Focused on...
Kentucky Senate Candidate Andy Barr Endorses Pro-Amnesty Book Despite Pledging to Be ‘Amer...
Even Jimmy Kimmel Is Mocking the Left for Their Sudden Love of Bad...
This Congressman's Inquiry Into Bad Bunny's Explicit Performance Has the Libs Screaming
Tipsheet

Grassley Blasts Democrats for Rushing Biden's Supreme Court Nomination

AP Photo/Evan Vucci

Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Chuck Grassley is blasting Democrats for breaking normal process to thoroughly vet and question Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. Jackson is President Joe Biden's nominee to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. 

Advertisement

"Vetting a nominee for a lifetime appointment to the high court is serious business. The American people rightly expect a full and thorough vetting process. We should not sacrifice the integrity of our constitutional advice and consent responsibility to meet an arbitrary timeline. The Court's next term doesn't begin until October, so there's absolutely no need to rush," Grassley released in a statement. 

Last week, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin announced Jackson's confirmation hearing will start on March 21. According to Grassley, the timeline leading up to the hearings has been truncated. 

"When Grassley chaired the committee during its consideration of Justice Kavanaugh's nomination, he announced the hearing dates a full month after the nomination was made, and after documents from Kavanaugh's government service had been requested and released," Grassley's office notes. "For recent Supreme Court nominees who've had prior federal government service, the committee's pre-hearing vet process has taken, on average, 53 days to allow sufficient time to receive and review records related to the nominee's government service. Chairman Durbin's proposed timeline allows for only 24 days – less than half the normal timeline for recent nominees with prior government service."

Advertisement

Further, Grassley argues Jackson's full record must be adequately examined given a seat on the Supreme Court is a lifetime appointment. 

"Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's prior service on the U.S. Sentencing Commission and as a federal public defender, including her time representing a Guantanamo Bay detainee, warrant the same scrutiny provided to the government records of other Supreme Court nominees," Grassley's office states. "Announcing a hearing date before even seeking these records in order to meet an ahistoric timeline risks casting doubt on the thoroughness of the vetting process." 

In 2020, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, nominated by President Donald Trump and the Supreme Court's most recent addition, was announced and seated on the court in 30 days. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos