Justice Department Approves Paramount Deal to Buy Warner Brothers. Here's Why Libs Are...
'Christian! Love Means You Let Us Sin All We Want to, and Pay...
Election Security Is Nonnegotiable
The Chickens Have Come Home to Roost for Cleveland Clinic
The Beleaguered State of Maine
Worry About Climate Fearmongering – Not Climate Change
Treasury Is Right to Examine the National Security Risks of Foreign-Funded Lawsuits
The Algorithm Knows Where, Not Why
Timely Care Is Compassionate Care. Then Why Are Families Still Waiting?
What Is Good Economic Policy?
Waning Prominence of Pride Month Is Cause for Hope
Paid Experts and Junk Science Corrupt America’s Courts
Terror in the Twelfth
U.S. Wins Big in World Cup Opener
WATCH: Tren de Aragua Leader Killed in American Strike, Trump Announces
Tipsheet

Graham Pushes Back on Durbin: No, We Aren't Going to Rush Confirmation for Merrick Garland

Graham Pushes Back on Durbin: No, We Aren't Going to Rush Confirmation for Merrick Garland
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham is pushing back on "highly unusual" efforts by Ranking Member Dick Durbin to rush through the confirmation hearing of Judge Merrick Garland, who has been nominated by President Joe Biden to become the next U.S. Attorney General. 

Advertisement

"Your request is highly unusual. The Senate is about to conduct its first ever impeachment trial of a former president, and only its fourth trial of a president, incumbent or not. Under the procedure the Senate has adopted, Donald Trump’s trial is set to start on February 9. But you want us to rush through Judge Garland’s hearing on February 8. An impeachment is no small thing. It requires the Senate’s complete focus. This is why I didn’t consider any judicial nominees during last year’s impeachment trial. Democrats do not get to score political points in an unprecedented act of political theater on one hand while also trying to claim the mantle of good government on the other," Graham wrote in a letter to Durbin, noting that all five previous attorney generals were given two day hearings. 

"I look forward to questioning Judge Garland and potentially supporting his nomination, but not on February 8. Governing requires trade-offs. When the Senate’s focus is required to consider whether to bar a former president from being reelected, other business must stop. Proceeding with the confirmation of an attorney general and the impeachment of a former president at the same time would give neither the attention required," he continued. 

Advertisement

Graham also noted that while Durbin is pushing to rush Garland's confirmation, the Committee is still missing key information and documents related to the nomination. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement