Why Are Americans Fleeing Blue States for Red States?
Let’s Rip Democrats Apart for Fun (and Because They’re Truly Awful)
CBS News Tried to Recalibrate Detention Stats — DHS Was Having None of...
Faith, Not Foul-Mouthed Scolds, Shined at the Grammys
Is There Any Good News Out There?
Has There Been Voter Fraud?
When Canadians Were Actually Funny
Man Who Pushed Propaganda About a Young Gazan Boy Slaughtered By The IDF...
America’s Security Doesn’t End at the Ice’s Edge
Girl Scout Cookies vs. the Inverted Food Pyramid
SBA Prioritizes American Citizens for New Loans
Let ICE Do Its Job
Will We Reach 100 Days of Straight Liberal Content on the Apple News...
Immigration Win: Federal Court Sides With Trump Admin on TPS Terminations for Multiple...
Federal Judge Blocks California Effort to Demask ICE Agents
Tipsheet

Graham Pushes Back on Durbin: No, We Aren't Going to Rush Confirmation for Merrick Garland

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham is pushing back on "highly unusual" efforts by Ranking Member Dick Durbin to rush through the confirmation hearing of Judge Merrick Garland, who has been nominated by President Joe Biden to become the next U.S. Attorney General. 

Advertisement

"Your request is highly unusual. The Senate is about to conduct its first ever impeachment trial of a former president, and only its fourth trial of a president, incumbent or not. Under the procedure the Senate has adopted, Donald Trump’s trial is set to start on February 9. But you want us to rush through Judge Garland’s hearing on February 8. An impeachment is no small thing. It requires the Senate’s complete focus. This is why I didn’t consider any judicial nominees during last year’s impeachment trial. Democrats do not get to score political points in an unprecedented act of political theater on one hand while also trying to claim the mantle of good government on the other," Graham wrote in a letter to Durbin, noting that all five previous attorney generals were given two day hearings. 

"I look forward to questioning Judge Garland and potentially supporting his nomination, but not on February 8. Governing requires trade-offs. When the Senate’s focus is required to consider whether to bar a former president from being reelected, other business must stop. Proceeding with the confirmation of an attorney general and the impeachment of a former president at the same time would give neither the attention required," he continued. 

Advertisement

Graham also noted that while Durbin is pushing to rush Garland's confirmation, the Committee is still missing key information and documents related to the nomination. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement