Jill Biden Is Still Supremely Angry With Nancy Pelosi
Despite Dem Theatrics, Expect Most of Trump's Nominees to Sail Through
WaPo Columnist: CA Wildfires Is Going to Generate a Political Earthquake
California Politicians Cut Fire Department Funding Because of These Three Things
Honestly, Who Cares If Michelle Obama Is at Trump’s Inauguration?
No One Should Be Fooled by Zuckerberg’s Supposed About-Face on Trump
Netanyahu Delays Cabinet Vote on Deal, Accuses Hamas of Creating 'Last Minute Crisis'
A Breath of Fresh Air
Right to the End, Biden Makes False Claims About Crime
These Crises Are the Direct Results of Democrat Policies
America First Diplomacy Is Back With Marco Rubio
The Fight to Protect Life Is Far From Over
Accountability Still Matters
How to Win and Lose a War at the Same Time
Above Us Only Sky
Tipsheet

Graham Pushes Back on Durbin: No, We Aren't Going to Rush Confirmation for Merrick Garland

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham is pushing back on "highly unusual" efforts by Ranking Member Dick Durbin to rush through the confirmation hearing of Judge Merrick Garland, who has been nominated by President Joe Biden to become the next U.S. Attorney General. 

Advertisement

"Your request is highly unusual. The Senate is about to conduct its first ever impeachment trial of a former president, and only its fourth trial of a president, incumbent or not. Under the procedure the Senate has adopted, Donald Trump’s trial is set to start on February 9. But you want us to rush through Judge Garland’s hearing on February 8. An impeachment is no small thing. It requires the Senate’s complete focus. This is why I didn’t consider any judicial nominees during last year’s impeachment trial. Democrats do not get to score political points in an unprecedented act of political theater on one hand while also trying to claim the mantle of good government on the other," Graham wrote in a letter to Durbin, noting that all five previous attorney generals were given two day hearings. 

"I look forward to questioning Judge Garland and potentially supporting his nomination, but not on February 8. Governing requires trade-offs. When the Senate’s focus is required to consider whether to bar a former president from being reelected, other business must stop. Proceeding with the confirmation of an attorney general and the impeachment of a former president at the same time would give neither the attention required," he continued. 

Advertisement

Graham also noted that while Durbin is pushing to rush Garland's confirmation, the Committee is still missing key information and documents related to the nomination. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement