Democrats Try Pretending to Be Normal to Fool Normal Voters
If The Dems Lose the Midterms, This Moment at the State of the...
Liberal Media Reactions to Trump's State of the Union Were Wild, But This...
The Mother of the Hughes Brothers Just Imploded a Ton of Liberal Narratives...
Pronoun Twitter Might Commit Mass Suicide After Trump Said This About the US...
Here's the Tweet That Best Summarized Trump's Epic State of the Union Address
Thank You, Jack Hughes
Bari Weiss, the Latest Target of Antisemitic Campus Intolerance
At America's 250th Birthday, Democrats Want a Different Country
The Demographic the Democrats Don't Need
Trump Administration and Congress Can Make American Energy Great Again
What Does 'Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness' Mean?
Is This the End of Organized Crime in Mexico?
'Show Cause' Tyranny by Anti-Trump Judges
New Polling Shows Why Planned Parenthood Could Be in Trouble Over SBA Investigation
Tipsheet

Democrat Law Professor: Trump Never Actually Called for Violence or a Riot

Democrat Law Professor: Trump Never Actually Called for Violence or a Riot
(AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Democrat and George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley is warning against claims President Trump "incited" violence at the Capitol last week. 

Advertisement

Further, Turley is warning against the impulse from Democrats on Capitol Hill to impeach President Trump for a second time and argues the precedent would encourage a barrage of snap impeachments over politics, rather than true high crimes or misdemeanors. 

"In my view, impeaching on the speech alone would raise serious concerns over the use of impeachment in the future. Many Democrats, including members of Congress, refused to accept Trump as the legitimate president when he was elected and refused to do so as rioting broke out at the inauguration.  Many of the same members have used the same type of rhetoric to 'take back the country' and 'fight for the country.' The concern is that this impeachment will not only create precedent for an expedited pathway of 'snap impeachments' but allow future Congresses to impeach presidents for actions of their supporters," Turley writes. "The point of this column is to call for greater caution and deliberation before we take this step to consider the basis and implications of this impeachment. As with the calls to use the 25th Amendment, there are real dangers to any opportunistic or hurried use of this option. There is also the alternative of a joint and bipartisan condemnation of both houses, which would be both justified and unassailable."

Advertisement

"As I have said, there could be evidence to support impeachment on the proposed incitement article but it would have to be found before or after the speech to show an intent to spark rioting or to allow it to continue.  As with the 25th Amendment claim, such evidence would be found from within the White House and through a traditional impeachment inquiry," he continues. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos