Dem Donor Reveals Who 'Commandeered' the White House After Disastrous CNN Debate
AG Pam Bondi: We're Going to Find Out Who Leaked ICE's Operation in...
You'll Never Guess Who Employs This Woman Caught Having an Antisemitic Meltdown in...
Who Is 'Big Balls' and Why Is CNN All Huffy About Him?
Investigating the Investigation, Not the Actual Scandal, and Confusion Over Who Is Actuall...
USA Today Uses Patrick Mahomes and Jalen Hurts to Lie About DEI
'60 Minutes' Sought to Impede Donald Trump and Run Cover for Kamala Harris
US Needs to Double Down on AI Supremacy
The ‘Cuckoo’s Nest’ and ‘The Gong Show’ Rolled Into One
From '45' to '46' to '47': Economic Drivers of the 2024 Presidential Election
2025 Offers New Opportunities for Next-Gen Satellite Broadband
How the Trump DOJ Can Counter the Threat From DeepSeek and Huawei
Donald Trump's Unspoken Insight
Trump’s Response to Time Magazine’s Attempt to Troll Him With Its New Cover...
DOGE Moves In: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Targeted After Biden Holdover Fired
Tipsheet

ICYMI: Andrew McCabe Was Given a Reality Check About Why He Was Fired from the FBI

(AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)

Fired Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe gave remote testimony the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday and was reminded about why he lost his job at the Bureau. Further, he was given a reality check about the double standard between himself and former White House National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. 

Advertisement

"General Flynn’s been prosecuted for lying to the FBI. You lied to the FBI and you aren’t being prosecuted. Don’t you think that sends the wrong message to the American people?" Republican Senator John Kennedy said. "You were not fired for parking in the handicapped parking spot at the FBI, were you? You were fired for lying, were you not?"

McCabe was indeed fired for lying to federal investigators. Not just once, but multiple times. From the Department to Justice Inspector General: 

Advertisement

We found that, in a conversation with then-Director Comey shortly after the WSJ article was published, McCabe lacked candor when he told Comey, or made statements that led Comey to believe, that McCabe had not authorized the disclosure and did not know who did.  This conduct violated FBI Offense Code 2.5 (Lack of Candor – No Oath).

We also found that on May 9, 2017, when questioned under oath by FBI agents from INSD, McCabe lacked candor when he told the agents that he had not authorized the disclosure to the WSJ and did not know who did.  This conduct violated FBI Offense Code 2.6 (Lack of Candor –  Under Oath).

We further found that on July 28, 2017, when questioned under oath by the OIG in a recorded interview, McCabe lacked candor when he stated: (a) that he was not aware of Special Counsel having been authorized to speak to reporters around October 30 and (b) that,  because he was not in Washington, D.C., on October 27 and 28, 2016, he was unable to say where Special Counsel was or what she was doing at that time.  This conduct violated FBI Offense Code 2.6 (Lack of Candor – Under Oath).

We additionally found that on November 29, 2017, when questioned under oath by the OIG in a recorded interview during which he contradicted his prior statements by acknowledging that he had authorized the disclosure to the WSJ, McCabe lacked candor when he: (a) stated that he told Comey on October 31, 2016, that he had authorized the disclosure to the WSJ; (b) denied telling INSD agents on May 9 that he had not authorized the disclosure to the WSJ about the PADAG call; and (c) asserted that INSD’s questioning of him on May 9 about the October 30 WSJ article occurred at the end of an unrelated meeting when one of the INSD agents pulled him aside and asked him one or two questions about the article. This conduct violated FBI Offense Code 2.6 (Lack of Candor –   Under Oath).

Lastly, we determined that as Deputy Director, McCabe was authorized to disclose the existence of the CF Investigation publicly if such a disclosure fell within the “public interest” exception in applicable FBI and DOJ policies generally prohibiting such a disclosure of an ongoing investigation.  However, we concluded that McCabe’s decision to confirm the existence of the CF Investigation through an anonymously sourced quote, recounting the content of a phone call with a senior Department official in a manner designed to advance his personal interests at the expense of Department leadership, was clearly not within the public interest exception.  We therefore concluded that McCabe’s disclosure of the existence of an ongoing investigation in this manner violated the FBI’s and the Department’s media policy and constituted misconduct.

Advertisement

Senator Kennedy elaborated on his questioning of McCabe during an interview with America's Newsroom Wednesday morning.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement