Trump Blasts Iranian Regime Over 'Foolish Violation of Our Ceasefire Agreement'
John Bolton Just Pleaded Guilty to Felony Count in Classified Documents Case
Mamdani Once Again Promises to Defy SCOTUS to Protect Illegal Aliens
Here's Gavin Newsom's Alarming Plan to Consolidate Power If He's Elected President
Scott Jennings: Republicans Are Winning the Argument Ahead of the Midterms
The United Nations' Disdain
Gavin Newsom Launches Attack on Conservative Media Ecosystem
Greg Steube Proposes New House Rule That Would Bar New York's Socialists From...
Why Is Thune Running Scared?
Tom Homan Just Demolished Trump's Critics in One Fiery Speech
Spencer Pratt Says One of LA's Largest Homeless NGO's Just Suffered a Major...
Zohran Mamdani Defies the Supreme Court, Vows to Protect Haitians and Syrians
Marco Rubio Isn't Shy About Calling Out the Iranian Regime for What It...
EXCLUSIVE: ICE Made Major Convicted Criminal Arrests Thursday
Pentagon Argues Budget Bill Is Critical for National Defense. Will the Senate Go...
Tipsheet

Graham on Filling SCOTUS Seat: After Kavanaugh, the Rules Changed

Graham on Filling SCOTUS Seat: After Kavanaugh, the Rules Changed
AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham is backing President Donald Trump’s calls for Republicans to fill the Supreme Court vacancy left by the late-Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Advertisement

Graham, who would oversee the nomination hearing for a Supreme Court nominee chosen by President Trump, is reiterating the difference between now and 2015 when President Barack Obama's nomination of Judge Merrick Garland failed. He's also rejecting lectures from Democrats about decency and fairness in the aftermath of the Kavanaugh hearings.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., chairman of the Judiciary Committee, which reviews Supreme Court nominations, said he's prepared to advance a nominee if a vacancy occurs this year.

"Yeah. We'll cross that bridge. After [Brett] Kavanaugh, the rules have changed as far as I'm concerned," he told reporters, citing the intense battle over Trump's most recent Supreme Court nominee in 2018, who was narrowly confirmed. "We'll see what the market will bear if that ever happens."

Graham, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, noted that both the Senate and the White House are held by Republicans, versus in 2016, when the GOP-held Senate denied Garland a hearing.

“Well, Merrick Garland was a different situation. You had the president of one party nominating, and you had the Senate in the hands of the other party. A situation where you've got them both would be different. I don't want to speculate, but I think appointing judges is a high priority for me in 2020,” Graham said in an interview on “Full Court Press with Greta Van Susteren” set to air Sunday.

"If you look into the history of the country, there had not been an occasion where somebody was confirmed in a presidential election year after primary started when you had divided government," he added.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, President Trump recently released the list of potential Supreme Court nominees he would consider in a second term. Democratic nominee and former Vice President Joe Biden has refused to reveal who he might nominate.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement