The Climate Change Agenda Has Come Crashing Down
How CNN Reacted to the Arrest of a Wisconsin Judge Accused of Trying...
The Fight Is Never Going to Stop
Trump Administration Walks Back Policy Revoking Anti-Israel Students' Visas
Pam Bondi Divulges the Disturbing Details on Two Judges Arrested for Protecting Illegal...
ABC Has a Hegseth Scandal With No Wrongdoing
Trump Admin Demands Crackdown on Illegal Immigrants Exploiting Food Stamp System
Jon Voight Will Present Trump With Plan to Fix Hollywood
Trump Tariffs Deal a Crushing Blow to Chinese Factories
WEF Forced to Investigate Whistleblower Claims Against Founder Klaus Schwab
Democrat Chicago Mayor Uses Trump Tariffs As Opportunity to Raise Taxes
Democratic Rep. Who Went on Unhinged Rant on House Floor in 2020 Is...
Trump Reveals If He'd Try to Run for a Third Term As President
‘Things Are Moving Quickly’ in Maine State Rep’s Censure Appeal
Schumer Is Getting Bad News From All Over, Even the Media
Tipsheet

Graham on Filling SCOTUS Seat: After Kavanaugh, the Rules Changed

AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham is backing President Donald Trump’s calls for Republicans to fill the Supreme Court vacancy left by the late-Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Advertisement

Graham, who would oversee the nomination hearing for a Supreme Court nominee chosen by President Trump, is reiterating the difference between now and 2015 when President Barack Obama's nomination of Judge Merrick Garland failed. He's also rejecting lectures from Democrats about decency and fairness in the aftermath of the Kavanaugh hearings.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., chairman of the Judiciary Committee, which reviews Supreme Court nominations, said he's prepared to advance a nominee if a vacancy occurs this year.

"Yeah. We'll cross that bridge. After [Brett] Kavanaugh, the rules have changed as far as I'm concerned," he told reporters, citing the intense battle over Trump's most recent Supreme Court nominee in 2018, who was narrowly confirmed. "We'll see what the market will bear if that ever happens."

Graham, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, noted that both the Senate and the White House are held by Republicans, versus in 2016, when the GOP-held Senate denied Garland a hearing.

“Well, Merrick Garland was a different situation. You had the president of one party nominating, and you had the Senate in the hands of the other party. A situation where you've got them both would be different. I don't want to speculate, but I think appointing judges is a high priority for me in 2020,” Graham said in an interview on “Full Court Press with Greta Van Susteren” set to air Sunday.

"If you look into the history of the country, there had not been an occasion where somebody was confirmed in a presidential election year after primary started when you had divided government," he added.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, President Trump recently released the list of potential Supreme Court nominees he would consider in a second term. Democratic nominee and former Vice President Joe Biden has refused to reveal who he might nominate.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement