It's Fight Night in New York
Zohran Mamdani Just Said This About What Should Happen to ICE
Leftist Empathy Is Not a Superpower
America's Favorite World Cup Fan Just Got an Incredible Dinner Invitation
This Interview Shows Why We Despite the Leftist Media
Republicans Hang On
Ted Cruz: AI Must Be Driven by Free Markets and Free Speech.
Tucker Carlson Is Done With the Republican Party. Good Riddance.
NCAA Announces Major Rules Changes to Student-Athlete Eligibility
Deranged Vandals Force Authorities to Implement New Security Measures Around Reflecting Po...
Immigration Attorney Gets Massive Fine For Filing Fraudulent Asylum Claims
These Antifa Terrorists Are Going To Be Spending Nearly 500 Years in Prison
James Talarico Drops Millions on Ad Campaign Filled With Falsehoods
Mamdani Mourns Death of Journalist Whom IDF Says Was a Hamas Terrorist
PA House Democrats Advance Bill Restricting School Choice Programs
Tipsheet

Graham on Filling SCOTUS Seat: After Kavanaugh, the Rules Changed

Graham on Filling SCOTUS Seat: After Kavanaugh, the Rules Changed
AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham is backing President Donald Trump’s calls for Republicans to fill the Supreme Court vacancy left by the late-Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Advertisement

Graham, who would oversee the nomination hearing for a Supreme Court nominee chosen by President Trump, is reiterating the difference between now and 2015 when President Barack Obama's nomination of Judge Merrick Garland failed. He's also rejecting lectures from Democrats about decency and fairness in the aftermath of the Kavanaugh hearings.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., chairman of the Judiciary Committee, which reviews Supreme Court nominations, said he's prepared to advance a nominee if a vacancy occurs this year.

"Yeah. We'll cross that bridge. After [Brett] Kavanaugh, the rules have changed as far as I'm concerned," he told reporters, citing the intense battle over Trump's most recent Supreme Court nominee in 2018, who was narrowly confirmed. "We'll see what the market will bear if that ever happens."

Graham, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, noted that both the Senate and the White House are held by Republicans, versus in 2016, when the GOP-held Senate denied Garland a hearing.

“Well, Merrick Garland was a different situation. You had the president of one party nominating, and you had the Senate in the hands of the other party. A situation where you've got them both would be different. I don't want to speculate, but I think appointing judges is a high priority for me in 2020,” Graham said in an interview on “Full Court Press with Greta Van Susteren” set to air Sunday.

"If you look into the history of the country, there had not been an occasion where somebody was confirmed in a presidential election year after primary started when you had divided government," he added.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, President Trump recently released the list of potential Supreme Court nominees he would consider in a second term. Democratic nominee and former Vice President Joe Biden has refused to reveal who he might nominate.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement