So I Got a Call From The New York Times...
Is a Red Line Still a Red Line?
The Bay of Figs
The Perpetual Climate Panic Machine 'Collapses'
What's the Matter With Minnesota?
Renee Good: ‘Social Justice’ Warrior, Vigilante, and Attempted Murderer
The Goal Posts Keep Shifting
Biological Reality, Women’s Future Success on Trial at the High Court
Devoid of Truth, Democrats Make It Up As They Go Along
Civil War?
Swiss Citizens Show the Way on Entitlement Reform
Trump Is the Ideas Guy — and That’s Why He Wins
The Left’s Cult of 'Effective Altruism' Will Doom America's AI Future
The Secret Drivers of Healthcare Inflation No One Wants to Talk About
Waiting for War
Tipsheet

FLASHBACK: When John Kerry Said Assad Destroyed "100 Percent" of His Chemical Weapons

When Syrian President Bashar al-Assad launched a chemical weapons attack on his own people in 2013, crossing President Obama's red line and killing more than 1400 innocent civilians, a military response was put aside in favor of diplomatic talks. 

Advertisement

The talks prompted a promise from Assad to destroy 100 percent of his chemical weapons, which the Obama administration touted as a successful concession from the regime. Then Secretary of State John Kerry argued the destruction of the chemical weapons was far more valuable than the U.S. ordering military strikes on Assad targets. 

After Assad's chemical attack on civilians earlier this week, it became clear stockpiles were not "100 percent" destroyed.

As Cortney noted, Politifact rated Kerry's statement at the time "mostly true," but issued a retraction in light of the attack earlier this week.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement