It Is Right and Proper to Laugh at the Suffering of Journalists
Here's the GOP Rep Whose Lightning Round of Questioning Wrecked the Biden DOJ
This Canadian News Outlet's Segment on the Recent School Shooting Makes MS Now...
CNN's Scott Jennings Wrecks a Lib Guest's Narrative on Election Integrity With a...
The Nancy Guthrie Abduction Story Has Become the Willy Wonka Ferry Ride of...
Lady, What the Hell Were You Thinking Eating This Crab!?
Border Czar Just Made a Huge Announcement About ICE Operations in Minnesota
Suburban Moms Are Learning Not to Obstruct ICE
Minnesota Is Now Home to the 'Largest Known Outbreak' of a Fungal Skin...
San Francisco Teachers' Union Is on Strike. Here's What They Just Demanded of...
Check Out NBC News’ Ridiculous Framing of ICE Lawsuit
David Axelrod's Lament of Skyrocketing ACA Premiums Is Undermined by David Axelrod
The Brilliant 'Reasoning' of the Left
NYC Needs School Choice—Not ‘Green Schools’
Housing Affordability Is About Politics, Not Economics
Tipsheet

Budget Director: Trump Isn't Spending Money on Climate Change Because It's a Waste of Money

Speaking to reporters yesterday from the White House briefing room, Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney was asked about the elimination of funding for climate change research in President Trump's budget. Mulvaney didn't mince words with his answer. 

Advertisement

"Part of your answer is focusing on efficiencies and focusing on doing what we do better. As to climate change, I think the President was fairly straightforward saying we’re not spending money on that anymore," Mulvaney said. "We consider that to be a waste of your money to go out and do that. So that is a specific tie to his campaign.”

Additionally, President Trump plans to cut at least 3000 positions from the Environmental Protection Agency, which the administration believes has grossly overstepped its regulatory authority in recent years. 

Meanwhile, the administration is also considering pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement after reports surfaced government scientists cooked the books to convince the Obama administration to sign on. The agreement costs American taxpayers more than $500 million and was committed to without Congressional approval.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos