We Need Democrats Like John Fetterman
The USCCB Issues New Directive Banning 'Gender-Affirming Care' at Catholic Healthcare Faci...
Not Ready? Please.
What New York City Has to Look Forward To
Russian Military Intelligence Ship Detected Off the Coast of Hawaii
The Candy Man
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 294: Trusting God Is a Challenge – Old...
Bosnian-Born U.S. Citizen Pleads Guilty to Lying About Wartime Crimes to Obtain Citizenshi...
Hong Kong Man Indicted in Alleged SEC Filing Fraud Linked to $211 Million...
Trump Threatens To Replace RINO Indiana Republicans Who Won't Redistrict
John Fetterman Recovering From Fall After 20 Stitches
Federal Firearm Indictments Up 292 Percent Under Expanded Project Safe Neighborhoods in No...
If There’s No God, There’s No Thought
Trump's 'Save the Christians' Battle Cry: It Is Heroic, but Dodges Nigeria's Deeper...
A Jarring Reminder of Our Nation’s Cultural Demise
Tipsheet

Grassley: 'Vague' FBI Letter on Clinton Case Leaves More Questions

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley is calling FBI Director James Comey's Sunday afternoon announcement reaffirming the Bureau's July decision not to indict Democrat Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton "vague" and in need of further explanation. 

Advertisement

“For months now, I’ve been urging the FBI to provide details regarding the scope of its investigation. The American people deserve to know whether the FBI sought to determine if Secretary Clinton and her aides deliberately maneuvered around federal open records laws or congressional investigations. Another vague announcement by the FBI has again failed to provide this context," Grassley released Sunday evening in a statement. "The growing number of unanswered questions demand explanations:  Is the FBI continuing to review the newly-revealed emails?  Did the FBI limit its review to email from when Clinton was Secretary of State, leaving out emails that could shed light on possible obstruction of Congress? Did the Justice Department authorize an application for a search warrant for this latest review, and if so, was it the first time such a tool was used in this investigation?  Did the FBI seek compulsory process earlier in its review, and if not, why not?  Answers to these questions would provide greater context of the FBI’s investigation and greater assurance to the American people of its thoroughness."

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Democrats back to praising Comey and the FBI after a week of condemnation for publicly announcing the investigation into Clinton's private server was reopened.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement