This Media Outlet Just Sued the Pentagon Over its New Policy
Tim Walz Can Dish It Out, but He Can't Take It
Guess How Many Democrats Voted Against Protecting Our Schools From Chinese Influence
Pope Leo Tells Europeans Worried About Islam to Be Less Fearful
Occam's Bazooka
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 297: Biblical Time Keeping – BC and AD...
Democratic Lawmakers Big Mad That Trump Admin is Fighting NarcoTerrorists
Trump Admin Sweeping Minneapolis For Illegals After Somali Fraud Exposed
Maryland Man Sentenced for Scheme Helping Foreign IT Workers Pose as U.S. Citizens
Arizona Father-Son Duo Sentenced for Massive Cross-Border Narcotics and Money Laundering S...
Two Miami Men Get 57 Months for Nationwide Sale of Diverted HIV and...
Federal Jury Finds Texas Resident Guilty in $150K PEMEX Bribery Plot
Another Person Stabbed on Charlotte Light Rail; Illegal Alien Arrested
The Dangerous Joy of Christmas: Standing With Persecuted Christians This Season
America First, Christian Nationalism, and Antisemitism
Tipsheet

Grassley: 'Vague' FBI Letter on Clinton Case Leaves More Questions

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley is calling FBI Director James Comey's Sunday afternoon announcement reaffirming the Bureau's July decision not to indict Democrat Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton "vague" and in need of further explanation. 

Advertisement

“For months now, I’ve been urging the FBI to provide details regarding the scope of its investigation. The American people deserve to know whether the FBI sought to determine if Secretary Clinton and her aides deliberately maneuvered around federal open records laws or congressional investigations. Another vague announcement by the FBI has again failed to provide this context," Grassley released Sunday evening in a statement. "The growing number of unanswered questions demand explanations:  Is the FBI continuing to review the newly-revealed emails?  Did the FBI limit its review to email from when Clinton was Secretary of State, leaving out emails that could shed light on possible obstruction of Congress? Did the Justice Department authorize an application for a search warrant for this latest review, and if so, was it the first time such a tool was used in this investigation?  Did the FBI seek compulsory process earlier in its review, and if not, why not?  Answers to these questions would provide greater context of the FBI’s investigation and greater assurance to the American people of its thoroughness."

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Democrats back to praising Comey and the FBI after a week of condemnation for publicly announcing the investigation into Clinton's private server was reopened.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement