CNN's National Security Analyst Dropped an Interesting Take on the Tesla Cybertruck Bomber
The FBI Used One Word That's Likely to Draw More Criticism in Latest...
Mike Johnson Scrambling to Gin Up Support Ahead of Speaker Vote. Will it...
Police Arrest Man for Allegedly Breaking Into NYC Mayor Eric Adams' Home
Mosque Near New Orleans Terrorist's Home Sends Out Message to Attendees
Police Just Raided Yet Another Eric Adams Ally
MSNBC Finally Admits What We All Knew About the Biden Admin
Teachers in This Blue State Will No Longer Need to Pass a Reading,...
Why People Are Concerned Over Trump's Massive Rally in DC Right Before Inauguration
Nancy Pelosi Heading Back to Washington to Impose 'San Francisco Values'
Of Course This Is How the Mainstream Media Covered Terrorist Attack in New...
This Colorado Democrat Will Run for Governor
Leftist Magazine Tries to Claim Vance Was 'Born to Immense Privilege'
Must See: CBS Reporter Rips Dems Over Lie-Filled SCOTUS Delegitimization Campaign
Newsom Applauded One of Trump's Immigration Stances
Tipsheet

Grassley: 'Vague' FBI Letter on Clinton Case Leaves More Questions

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley is calling FBI Director James Comey's Sunday afternoon announcement reaffirming the Bureau's July decision not to indict Democrat Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton "vague" and in need of further explanation. 

Advertisement

“For months now, I’ve been urging the FBI to provide details regarding the scope of its investigation. The American people deserve to know whether the FBI sought to determine if Secretary Clinton and her aides deliberately maneuvered around federal open records laws or congressional investigations. Another vague announcement by the FBI has again failed to provide this context," Grassley released Sunday evening in a statement. "The growing number of unanswered questions demand explanations:  Is the FBI continuing to review the newly-revealed emails?  Did the FBI limit its review to email from when Clinton was Secretary of State, leaving out emails that could shed light on possible obstruction of Congress? Did the Justice Department authorize an application for a search warrant for this latest review, and if so, was it the first time such a tool was used in this investigation?  Did the FBI seek compulsory process earlier in its review, and if not, why not?  Answers to these questions would provide greater context of the FBI’s investigation and greater assurance to the American people of its thoroughness."

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Democrats back to praising Comey and the FBI after a week of condemnation for publicly announcing the investigation into Clinton's private server was reopened.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement