Three Times Trump's Latest Oval Office Meeting Left Viewers Stunned
In 2015, Biden Joked About Getting Prostate Cancer As a Reason to Leave...
Trump Did Something That Left the South African President Aghast
Pro-Hamas Protesters Hijack Columbia University's Graduation in Fiery Display
Did Trans Activists Really Think This Yosemite Stunt Was Going to Change Anything?
Judge Tries Again to Block the Trump Administration's Deportations
Are Suppressors Going to Be Delisted From NFA After All?
There's a Difference Between Being Pro-2A and Anti-Gun Control
After Illegal Immigrant Adult Allegedly Impersonated a HS Student for Over a Year,...
Still Another Poll Brings Hope for a Potential Stefanik Gubernatorial Run
Air Force Vet Held in Venezuela ‘Excited To Be Home’ After Ric Grenell...
Will the House Freedom Caucus Support Trump's Big, Beautiful Bill? When Will the...
GOP Lawmaker Wonders Who Was Really Running the US Under Biden
Setting the Record Straight on Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
Trump Isn't Letting Up on Concerns With Who Was Running the Country Under...
Tipsheet

Unsurprising to See Who Is Defending Clinton's Mishandling of Classified Docs

Andrew McCabe, CNN's senior law enforcement analyst, defended former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's mishandling of classified information while discussing former President Donald Trump upcoming arraignment for his alleged mishandling of classified documents at his estate at Mar-a-Lago.

Advertisement

"But let’s talk about the Hillary Clinton case, because that was a serious breach of protocol and she was criticized by the FBI director at the time for being — I think he used the word ‘reckless,’ I might be wrong. But what is the difference?" host Jake Tapper asked.

"There’s huge differences here, Jake. And unlike what you’ve heard from Congressmen McCarthy and Biggs, our system is not based on — you know, we don’t play by organized crime rules. It’s not you take out one of my guys, I take out one of your guys. It’s all equal," McCabe, the former deputy FBI director, said.

"In the Clinton case, what we had in the Clinton case was essentially 113 E-mail conversations, this is of tens of thousands of E-mails reviewed, the 30,000 she handed over plus many thousands more we were able to recover, 113 E-mails over the course of 55 conversations, eight-top secret documents, 37 secret doc — not documents, content judged to be at that level and 10 at the confidential level. Important to note that none of that was actual documents bearing headers and footers and classified stamps and portion markings and all the sorts of things you expect to see," McCabe continued, adding, "It was simply content of conversations that implicated information that should have been classified at that level."

Advertisement

Tapper said the investigation into Clinton's actions did not find evidence of her trying to hide the classified information from the government.

"Neither the IG nor the FBI was able to cover any evidence of intentionality, intention to remove material, intention to withhold material, intention to essentially converse in classified ways," McCabe said. "It was simply conversations, mostly it was information that was sent to Secretary Clinton while she was secretary and that she either responded to or received."

What McCabe left out is it was not just emails, but the secret server Clinton maintained until her office's practice was uncovered.


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement