You Won’t Believe Who Just Cheered Iran’s Islamic Revolution
OpenAI Fires Executive Who Warned About 'Adult Mode'
Axios Is Having a Tough Go of Things This Week, and Media Are...
In Defense of Female Inmates
Canada's MAiD Program Is About to Get Even More Horrifying
Backlash Grows Over the University of Notre Dame's Appointment of Pro-Abortion Professor
Megyn Kelly’s Moral Blind Spot: Refusing to Condemn Candace Owens
Democrat Ohio Senate Hopeful Sherrod Brown Supports an AG Candidate Who Vowed to...
California Campaign Adviser Sentenced to 48 Months in PRC Agent Case
19 New York City Residents Reportedly Freeze to Death After Mamdani Changes Homeless...
Colorado Woman Allegedly Billed $400K to Medicaid for Family’s Phantom Medical Rides
Philadelphia Men Allegedly Used ChatGPT to Scam Minnesota Out of $3.5M
Queens Duo Charged in Alleged Decade-Long $120 Million Medicare Scam
White House Blasts Washington Post Over ‘Breaking’ Story Trump Announced Last Year
‘Customer Has Spoken’: Ford Motor Company Faces $11 Billion Hit on EV Investments
Tipsheet

Will the Judiciary Committee Investigate the SCOTUS Leaker? Here's What Dick Durbin Had to Say.

AP Photo/Susan Walsh, Pool

Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, told CNN on Sunday they will not devote time to investigate who leaked the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization draft decision as the official inquiry has yielded no main suspects. 

Advertisement

The 2022 leak was unprecedented in the Court's history, especially given the hotly contested nature of the draft decision detailing how Roe v. Wade was going to be overturned. The justices and their immediate family members did not have to sign sworn affidavits saying they didn’t leak the draft opinion for the Court's investigation, unlike their clerks. 

"So, do you believe that that was a mistake? Should they have done so to figure out where the leak came from?” host Dana Bash asked. 

"Listen, the universe of people who are suspects in this leak of an opinion of the Supreme Court is really a small universe. It includes the justices and their families, if they had access to this opinion, which I assume some of them did," Durbin said. "They should have gone into the — at least a position of assertions by each one of the justices as to what they did or did not do when it came to these opinions. But I find it hard to imagine, with this small group of people who had access to this opinion, they couldn’t come up with more information." 

Advertisement

Related:

SUPREME COURT

"Are you going to try, in your capacity as Judiciary chair?" Bash asked. 

"No, I don’t think this is an area where we can go in with any kind of force and make for a changed result at this point," Durbin replied.            


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos