Notice Anything Regarding All These Angry, Miserable White Liberal Women?
CNN's Top Legal Analyst Was Blunt About the Minnesota Dems' Outrageous Anti-ICE Lawsuit
Fox News' Greg Gutfeld Has an Exercise That Makes the 'Fake Empathy Liberal...Return...
About That Sonic Boom Weapon We Reportedly Deployed During Trump's Venezuela Raid...
Do You Think Liberals Know They're Wrong About the ICE Shooting in Minneapolis?
Is Trump Souring on Pam Bondi?
Dilbert Creator Scott Adams Has Died at 68
Here's the Insane Reason a U.K. Asylum Seeker Was Spared Jail Despite Sex...
Trump to Iran: Help Is on the Way
Flashback: There Was a Time Democrats Were Okay With Separating Illegal Immigrant Families
Trump Administration Makes Another Big Move to Deport Somalis
ICE, ICE Baby?
The Left Is So Desperate to Defend Their Minneapolis Narrative, They’ve Hit a...
A Chicago Man Was Brutally Attacked in the Loop. Guess How Many Times...
The December Inflation Report Is Here, and It's Good News
Tipsheet

Kyle Rittenhouse Provides Update on Which Big Tech Company He Is Suing

Sean Krajacic/The Kenosha News via AP

Kyle Rittenhouse provided an update to his ongoing plans to sue the entities who defamed him as a racist mass shooter when he actually defended himself during the 2020 BLM riots in Kensoha, Wisconsin.

Advertisement

Rittenhouse and attorney Todd McMurtry told Fox News host Tucker Carlson they are looking at Facebook in particular because of how Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg described Rittenhouse's act of self-defense.

"We're going to make the media pay for what they did to me. They made it hard for me to live a normal life. I cannot go out in public. I can't go to the store. It’s hard for me to go anywhere without security. Doing basic things like taking my dog to the dog park is difficult. They made it really difficult to be normal. They affected future job opportunities to me," Rittenhouse explained.

"The first one I am taking looking at is Facebook. Mark Zuckerberg announced in a videotape that what Kyle was involved in was a mass murder and that is clearly defamatory as well. That is not protected by Section 230, the Communications Decency Act. In my opinion, Section 230 allows you to take down violent things or things that people don’t want to hear by telling the truth about Kyle, is not something that Section 230 enabled Facebook to take down. So that’s an example of what we plan to do with tech and also plan to do in the defamation arena," McMurtry said.

Advertisement

McMurtry pointed out that while news outlets can report on alleged crimes perpetrated by individuals, "but calling somebody a murderer in certain circumstances can be actionable. Other things that media personalities and people on social media said were clearly defamatory."

"I think that we have some strong grounds to proceed. We're...starting to look at those and evaluate them and look at opportunities to hold the media and tech accountable as Kyle promised," McMurtry added.

Rittenhouse said there have been a few instances of being harassed in public because of being defamed but his security team has been able to handle those situations.


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement