Trump Took on the International Elites at Davos. You Know They're Steaming
Appeals Court Puts the Kibosh on Insane Judge's Ruling That Hamstrung ICE Agents...
Dana Bash Recalibrates Both Sides of ICE Protest, and Sen. Cruz Is Guilty...
The Left Is Baby Brain Damage
Trump Blasts Canadian PM Mark Carney's Lack of Gratitude for American Strength
Tucker Carlson's Latest Newsletter Argues That a Nuclear Iran Could Be 'a Good...
Justice Clarence Thomas' Response to Hawaii Gun-Control Law, Grounded in Racist Black Code...
Trump Jokes With Newsom During His World Economic Forum Speech: 'I Would Call...
The Left's Search for a New Cause
Former TD Bank Worker Helped Launder $26 Million Through Shell Accounts, Prosecutors Say
President Trump Sounds Alarm Over UK Giving Up Key U.S. Military Base
U.S. Sues Louisiana Hospital Operator Over Alleged Medicare Fraud and Kickbacks
House Oversight Sends Contempt Resolution Against Clintons to Full House Over Epstein Prob...
Man Faces Federal Charges for Alleged Online Threats to Kill ICE Agents
The Republicans Are Launching an Investigation Into Ilhan Omar's Mysterious Net Worth Expl...
Tipsheet

NPR Gets Dragged for Phony Fact Check on Hawley's Statements on SCOTUS Nominee

Al Drago/Pool via AP

NPR got pushback from Twitter users after it reported Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) "continued his misleading assertion" Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson had been lenient on child porn offenders when he questioned her during her confirmation hearing on Tuesday.

Advertisement

Hawley noted during his line of questioning that Jackson not only gave lighter sentences to child porn offenders than what federal guidelines recommended but he also pointed out she gave lesser sentences than what prosecutors were asking for and what she said in relation to the cases:

Advertisement

"You said that this defendant, through whom you only sentenced to three months in prison...'Your collection at the time you that were caught was not actually as large as it seems'...You also told the defendant, 'This seems to be a case where you were fascinated by sexual images involving essentially what were your peers.'"

"Judge, he was 18. These kids are 8. I don't see in what sense they're peers," he added.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement