Read a Venezuelan Guard's 'Chilling' Account About the Delta Force Raid That Nabbed...
Watch What Happens When This Leftist Protester Accosts a CNN Reporter in Minneapolis
Is This Why the Media Isn't Covering the Iran Protests?
Trump Is Minnesota's President, Too
Here's How Much Commie Mamdani's 'Affordable' Government Housing Will Cost You
Knoxville Orchestra Plays Sour Notes of Racial Preference over Talent
ICE Stories They Don’t Tell You
Kristi Noem Torches CNN’s Jake Tapper in Fiery Clash Over Minneapolis ICE Shooting
Miami Jury Convicts Two Executives in $34M Medicare Advantage Brace Fraud Scheme
Chinese National With Overstayed Visa Charged as Ringleader in Firearms Conspiracy
CNN Panel Sparks Firestorm After Abby Phillip Calls Somali Families 'Victims' of Minnesota...
Syrian Man Pleads Guilty to Stealing Nearly $191K in U.S. Social Security Benefits
Leftist Agitators Stalk and Threaten to Kill Journalist Covering Minneapolis Unrest
Minneapolis Radicals Begin Distributing Devices to Disable ICE Vehicles
Sons of Liberty, Sons of Legacy: Forming the Men Who Will Shape America’s...
Tipsheet

WaPo Debunks Their Own Story Criticizing Tom Cotton for Spreading 'Conspiracy Theory' About Wuhan Lab

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

The Washington Post has rebutted its own previous reporting that had criticized Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) for spreading a "conspiracy theory" on the possible origins of the Wuhan coronavirus.

Advertisement

During the early stage of the pandemic, Cotton said it was possible COVID-19 originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), a lab that had become China’s first laboratory to achieve the highest level of international bioresearch safety (BSL-4).

In a story published on February 17, the Post labeled it a "fringe theory." The outlet's experts also appeared to have wrongly assumed Cotton thought it was deliberately released:

"In response to Cotton’s remarks, as well as in previous interviews with The Washington Post, numerous experts dismissed the possibility the coronavirus may be man-made.

'There’s absolutely nothing in the genome sequence of this virus that indicates the virus was engineered,” said Richard Ebright, a professor of chemical biology at Rutgers University. 'The possibility this was a deliberately released bioweapon can be firmly excluded."

Vipin Narang, an associate professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said it is 'highly unlikely' the general population was exposed to a virus through an accident at a lab.

'We don’t have any evidence for that,' said Narang, a political science professor with a background in chemical engineering. 

'It’s a skip in logic to say it’s a bioweapon that the Chinese developed and intentionally deployed, or even unintentionally deployed,' Narang said."

Advertisement

In a new story published on April 14, the Post reported, "State Department cables warned of safety issues at Wuhan lab studying bat coronaviruses."

In the new report, it was revealed U.S. embassy officials who had visited WIV several times sent two official warnings back to Washington, D.C. about inadequate safety at the lab, which was conducting studies on coronaviruses from bats two years ago. They were concerned about the potential human transmission of SARS-like virus that could lead to a new pandemic, similar to what the world is experiencing today.

It is important to note Cotton never definitely stated COVID-19 came out of the WIV, intentionally or not, rather he wanted an investigation to determine if the theory was sound, and the media ridiculed him for such a suggestion.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement