It’s Their Own Fault We No Longer Default to Respect
There Was a Horrific School Shooting in Canada...and Their Police Used a Weird...
Person of Interest Arrested in Connection to the Abduction of Nancy Guthrie
Fraud Nation
Technological Sweet Spot
Public Opinion: A Tyrant Against Hard Decisions
Peggy Noonan Loses Her Noodle Over Washington Post Layoffs
Misconduct Rampant: America’s Leaders Increasingly Prioritize Agendas Over Fairness, Laws
Pass the SAVE America Act
Trump's DOJ Seeks Justice for Victims of Benghazi
2026 Olympics: Let’s Talk About Crotch Scandals
The Washington Post Is Paying the Bill for Free Speech
Republicans Siding With Big Banks in Stablecoin Fight Could Tank Trump’s Affordability Age...
Freezing Deaths, Garbage Piles in Largest Sanctuary City
Woke DC Grand Jury Denies Indictments of Six Democrats Accused of Sedition
Tipsheet

Jay Sekulow Explains the Real Reason Why Lt. Col. Vindman Spoke Out Against Trump

Senate Television via AP

Jay Sekulow, a member of President Trump's defense team, explained why Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman chose to testify against President Trump during the House's impeachment hearings last year.

Advertisement

Vindman said he was concerned over the phone call Trump had with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, where they discussed an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, over allegations of corruption in the country.

Addressing the Senate on Monday, Sekulow said Vindman simply had a policy disagreement with the commander in chief and basing an impeachment of a such a reason sets a dangerous precedent.

"Asking a foreign leader to get to the bottom of issues of corruption is not a violation of an oath. It was interesting because there was a lot of discussion the other day about Lieutenant Colonel Vindman, and one of the things that we reiterate is that he himself said he did not know if there’s anything of crime or anything of that nature," he said. 

"He had deep policy concerns. I think that is what this is really about. Deep policy concerns. Deep policy differences. We live in a constitutional republic where you have deep policy concerns and deep differences. That should not be the basis of an impeachment. If the bar of impeachment has now reached that level, then for the sake of the republic, the danger that puts not just this body but our entire constitutional framework in is unimaginable," Sekulow explained.

Advertisement

Related:

IMPEACHMENT

Sekulow then asked if "every time there’s a policy difference of significance, or an approach difference of significance about a policy, we are going to start an impeachment proceeding?"

Trump was impeached by House Democrats on abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement