The Liberal Media Fell for Iranian Misinformation Hook, Line, and Sinker
So, About That Letter Tyler Robinson Penned to His Trans Lover...
Supposedly, This Is the Person Who Saved Tulsi Gabbard's Job
OpenAI Faces Investigation Over Allegations That ChatGPT Helped Mass Shooter Kill Two Peop...
It’s ‘Shoot The Messenger Week’ As Jen Psaki Slams Local Media Holding a...
Democrats Don't Like Being Reminded of Their Deadly Policies
Could Pluto Become a Planet Again?
Do The Podcaster's Even Matter? New Polling Suggests That They Don't
US Oil & Gas Just Totally Embarrassed CA Dem Tom Steyer After He...
Steve Hilton Surges In the Polls Following Trump Endorsement in the California Governor's...
Victory Over Death
Ex-Staffer Says That Rep. Eric Swalwell Sexually Assaulted Her
'Ketamine Queen' Gets 15 Years in Prison After Supplying Ketamine Linked to Matthew...
Democrat Politician Who Targeted Easter Churchgoers Also Attacked July Fourth Celebrants
Why America Leads the World in Innovation
Tipsheet

Jay Sekulow Explains the Real Reason Why Lt. Col. Vindman Spoke Out Against Trump

Jay Sekulow Explains the Real Reason Why Lt. Col. Vindman Spoke Out Against Trump
Senate Television via AP

Jay Sekulow, a member of President Trump's defense team, explained why Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman chose to testify against President Trump during the House's impeachment hearings last year.

Advertisement

Vindman said he was concerned over the phone call Trump had with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, where they discussed an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, over allegations of corruption in the country.

Addressing the Senate on Monday, Sekulow said Vindman simply had a policy disagreement with the commander in chief and basing an impeachment of a such a reason sets a dangerous precedent.

"Asking a foreign leader to get to the bottom of issues of corruption is not a violation of an oath. It was interesting because there was a lot of discussion the other day about Lieutenant Colonel Vindman, and one of the things that we reiterate is that he himself said he did not know if there’s anything of crime or anything of that nature," he said. 

"He had deep policy concerns. I think that is what this is really about. Deep policy concerns. Deep policy differences. We live in a constitutional republic where you have deep policy concerns and deep differences. That should not be the basis of an impeachment. If the bar of impeachment has now reached that level, then for the sake of the republic, the danger that puts not just this body but our entire constitutional framework in is unimaginable," Sekulow explained.

Advertisement

Related:

IMPEACHMENT

Sekulow then asked if "every time there’s a policy difference of significance, or an approach difference of significance about a policy, we are going to start an impeachment proceeding?"

Trump was impeached by House Democrats on abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos