Ex-Obama Aide Laments How Trump Has Taken Over the Obama Coalition
Artificial Intelligence Just Did Something Terrifying in a Test — We Might Be...
House Republicans Move to Cut Funding to 'Transgender Animal Research'
Pete Hegseth Places Restrictions on Reporters Covering the Pentagon to Stop Leaks
Inside the Left’s Weird New Push to Paint Trump As Mentally Unfit
Did Feds Just Open the Door for Machine Guns?
New England State Becomes First in the Area to Ban Sanctuary City Policies
Hochul Worried She'll Have to Cut Services for Illegal Aliens Amid GOP-Backed Spending...
Pelosi Brutally Mocked After Claiming This Is the Reason She Entered Politics
Hegseth Hammers Press Inside Pentagon Amid National Security Concerns
David Hogg Has Lost His Mind After Suggesting This Is Who Should Run...
Trump to West Point Grads: 'You Are Winners' in Return to America First...
James Comer Urges Pam Bondi to Prosecute Biden Family
Newsom Furious, Vows Legal Fight After Senate Repeals EV Mandate Waiver
WaPo Columnist Accuses Jill Biden of 'Elder Abuse' Over Biden's 2024 Campaign Push
Tipsheet

Jay Sekulow Explains the Real Reason Why Lt. Col. Vindman Spoke Out Against Trump

Senate Television via AP

Jay Sekulow, a member of President Trump's defense team, explained why Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman chose to testify against President Trump during the House's impeachment hearings last year.

Advertisement

Vindman said he was concerned over the phone call Trump had with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, where they discussed an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, over allegations of corruption in the country.

Addressing the Senate on Monday, Sekulow said Vindman simply had a policy disagreement with the commander in chief and basing an impeachment of a such a reason sets a dangerous precedent.

"Asking a foreign leader to get to the bottom of issues of corruption is not a violation of an oath. It was interesting because there was a lot of discussion the other day about Lieutenant Colonel Vindman, and one of the things that we reiterate is that he himself said he did not know if there’s anything of crime or anything of that nature," he said. 

"He had deep policy concerns. I think that is what this is really about. Deep policy concerns. Deep policy differences. We live in a constitutional republic where you have deep policy concerns and deep differences. That should not be the basis of an impeachment. If the bar of impeachment has now reached that level, then for the sake of the republic, the danger that puts not just this body but our entire constitutional framework in is unimaginable," Sekulow explained.

Advertisement

Sekulow then asked if "every time there’s a policy difference of significance, or an approach difference of significance about a policy, we are going to start an impeachment proceeding?"

Trump was impeached by House Democrats on abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement