Did The New York Times Criticize 'Epic Fury' Using the Man Investigated for...
Gavin Newsom Is Many Things. 'Pro-Family' Is Not One of Them.
Rep. Tom Tiffany Introduces Legislation to End Birthright Citizenship Loophole Being Explo...
Is This PA Congressional Candidate Already Living the D.C. Insider Lifestyle?
Oregon Senate Committee Guts Gun Control Bill
President Trump Blasts Tucker Carlson: 'He’s Not MAGA'
GOP Rep Defends American Foreign Policy, Explains Why Operation Epic Fury Was Inevitable
Senator Tim Sheehy Helps to Forcibly Remove Crazed Protester During Senate Hearing
State Department Says That U.S., Venezuela Have Re-Established Diplomatic Relations
Federal Court Sentences Illegal Alien to Prison for $343K SNAP Benefits Fraud
CENTCOM: U.S. Has Destroyed More Than 30 Iranian Ships
NY AG Letitia James Sues Video Game Maker Over Loot Boxes
New Jersey Man Pleads Guilty in $600M Nationwide Catalytic Converter Theft Ring
U.S. House Rejects Resolution to Stop Strikes on Iran
Juror Bribery Plot in Feeding Our Future Fraud Trial Leads to 57-Month Sentence
Tipsheet

Jay Sekulow Explains the Real Reason Why Lt. Col. Vindman Spoke Out Against Trump

Jay Sekulow Explains the Real Reason Why Lt. Col. Vindman Spoke Out Against Trump
Senate Television via AP

Jay Sekulow, a member of President Trump's defense team, explained why Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman chose to testify against President Trump during the House's impeachment hearings last year.

Advertisement

Vindman said he was concerned over the phone call Trump had with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, where they discussed an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, over allegations of corruption in the country.

Addressing the Senate on Monday, Sekulow said Vindman simply had a policy disagreement with the commander in chief and basing an impeachment of a such a reason sets a dangerous precedent.

"Asking a foreign leader to get to the bottom of issues of corruption is not a violation of an oath. It was interesting because there was a lot of discussion the other day about Lieutenant Colonel Vindman, and one of the things that we reiterate is that he himself said he did not know if there’s anything of crime or anything of that nature," he said. 

"He had deep policy concerns. I think that is what this is really about. Deep policy concerns. Deep policy differences. We live in a constitutional republic where you have deep policy concerns and deep differences. That should not be the basis of an impeachment. If the bar of impeachment has now reached that level, then for the sake of the republic, the danger that puts not just this body but our entire constitutional framework in is unimaginable," Sekulow explained.

Advertisement

Related:

IMPEACHMENT

Sekulow then asked if "every time there’s a policy difference of significance, or an approach difference of significance about a policy, we are going to start an impeachment proceeding?"

Trump was impeached by House Democrats on abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement