Oh, You Knew This View Co-Host Was Going to Go There Regarding Marco...
The Socialist Who Recruited Graham Platner Was Banned from This Dem Rep's Campaign....
The Timing of These Dem Campaign Fund Reallocations Is a Bit Peculiar Regarding...
Joe & Mika Display Platner Denialism; Time Magazine Zeroes in on the Big...
The Usual Suspects Are Attacking Queen Camilla for Meeting With J.K. Rowling
The FCC Chair Casts Doubt on ABC's Claim That 'The View' Is a...
Scott Jennings Says Clean Voter Rolls Are Just Common Sense
Gavin Newsom Got Testy With Reporters Who Asked About His Tax Returns
Two NYC Churches Were Firebombed, and Zohran Mamdani's Hasn't Said a Word
This Is the One Chart Democrats Won’t Want You to See
Chinese National Sentenced to 70 Months for $2.2 Million Gift Card Laundering Scheme
Treasury Slaps Sanctions on Iran Supreme Leader's Personal Banker
Platner Officially Calls It Quits – But Exits With a Profane Far-Left Message
Charlotte Auto Theft Ring Leader Sentenced to 8 Years for Stealing Over 100...
EXCLUSIVE: Attempted Murderer, Convicted Rapist Arrested by ICE
Tipsheet

A Budget Boondoggle – Livable Communities?

A Budget Boondoggle – Livable Communities?

Yesterday, the House Budget Committee bestowed yet another one of the coveted “Budget Boondoggle Awards” on the Obama Administration and, as I suppose there won’t be any acceptance speeches made at the White House, I thought I’d share the news with you. 

Advertisement

But, it isn’t the fact that the administration won yet another Budget Boondoggle Award that surprises me.  Examples of President Obama’s waste of tax dollars abound.  What really surprises me, is the subject of the award which is truly stunning: 

A proposed new “Office of Livable Communities” which would cost $20 million in taxpayer dollars and is part of the administration’s proposed $527 million increase for “livable communities” initiative.

So…what exactly is a “livable community”?

Good question. The House Budget Committee asked Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood to define “livability” and he responded that it, “...Means being able to take your kids to school, go to work, see a doctor, drop by the grocery or post office, go out to dinner and a movie, and play with your kids in a park, all without having to get into your car.”

Again…what? Why is the federal government spending tax dollars for what ought to be left up to state and local levels of government. And, while we are at it, do we really need another new bureaucracy in the Department of Transportation set up for the sole purpose of imposing utopian neighborhood planning approved by the agenda du jour in Washington? The short answer is No.

Advertisement

Spending tax money on a program as ridiculous as this almost should make it unnecessary to mention that this new spending is being proposed at time when we are facing a $1.5 trillion deficit, when we are $13 trillion in debt, and when we should be adding more private sector jobs rather than more government jobs.

To learn more about the Budget Boondoggle Award: http://house.gov/budget_republicans/hbcboondoggleaward.shtml

To learn more about House Budget Republicans’ efforts to cut spending now: http://house.gov/budget_republicans/press/cutspendingnow.pdf

To learn more about House Republican Whip Eric Cantor’s effort to combat the permissive culture of runaway spending in Congress: http://republicanwhip.house.gov/YouCut/

To speak out for yourself on the need to keep spending in check: http://www.americaspeakingout.com/

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement