Over 800 Google Workers Demand the Company Cut Ties With ICE
UNL Student Government Passes SJP-Backed Israel Divestment Resolution
AOC Mourns the Loss of ’Our Media,’ More Layoffs Across the Industry (and...
The Left Just Doesn't Understand Why WaPo Is Failing
16 Years and $16 Billion Later the First Railhead Goes Down for CA's...
New Musical Remakes Anne Frank As a Genderqueer Hip-Hop Star
Toledo Man Indicted for Threatening to Kill Vice President JD Vance During Ohio...
Fort Lauderdale Financial Advisor Sentenced to 20 Years for $94M International Ponzi Schem...
FCC Is Reportedly Investigating The View
Illegal Immigrant Allegedly Used Stolen Identity to Vote and Collect $400K in Federal...
$26 Billion Gone: Stellantis Joins Automakers Retreating From EVs
House Oversight Chair: Clintons Don’t Get Special Treatment in Epstein Probe
Utah Man Sentenced for Stealing Funds Meant to Aid Ukrainian First Responders
Ex-Bank Employee Pleads Guilty to Laundering $8M for Overseas Criminal Organization
State Department Orders Evacuation of US Citizens in Iran As Possibility of Military...
Tipsheet

Working the System

In a recently published article in Government Executive Magazine Robert Brodsky uncovers that "the 20 biggest federal contractors received at least 80 earmarks worth more than $212 million." (See the chart below to see who garnered the most)

Advertisement

These big companies know how to maneuver through the system, and how the current system operates, that means they have lobbyists willing to make campaign contributions to members who are willing to sponsor earmarks.  They also know this is an easy way of circumventing the competitive bidding process, thereby undercutting smaller firms.

The House has established rules for transparency, requiring members to certify who requested the earmark as well as whom the beneficiary would be.  The Senate established a similar rule before the Democratic leadership watered down the rule so that the requesting Senator only has to declare that the earmark will not end up in personal financial gain. 

The 80 earmarks scrutinized by this report are only from members of the House;  meaning that roughly $5.3 billion were sponsored or cosponsored by one or more members of the Senate, without disclosure of the beneficiary.

I don’t know about you, but $5.3 billion is not a small sum of money, and if I am paying for it, I want to know where it is going and for what.

It is clear from this report that the earmarking process is far from reformed.

Advertisement

Contractor

Earmarks

Total Value

Lockheed Martin Corp

3

$4,680,000

Boeing Co.

2

$5,000,000

Northrop Grumman Corp.

7

$27,800,000

General Dynamics Corp.

9

$22,000,000

Raytheon Co.

7

$21,800,000

KBR Inc.

0

$0

L-3 Communications Holdings

19

$54,140,000

SAIC

11

$21,400,000

United Technologies Corp.

1

$3,200,000

BAE Systems

7

$16,800,000

McKesson Corp.

0

$0

Bechtel Group Inc.

0

$0

University of California System

4

$6,800,000

Computer Sciences Corp.*

0

$0

General Electric Co.

3

$5,500,000

Fluor Corp.

0

$0

Humana Inc.

0

$0

Battelle Memorial Institute

3

$8,800,000

EDS

0

$0

Honeywell Inc.

4

$14,800,000

Total

80

$212,720,000


Top 20 contractors courtesy of Eagle Eye Publishers

*A $1 million House earmark was eliminated in conference with the Senate

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos