A Few Simple Snarky Rules to Make Life Better
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 306: ‘Fear Not' Old Testament – Part 2
The War on Warring
Jasmine Crockett Finally Added Some Policy to Her Website and it Was a...
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
The Real United States of America
These Athletes Are Getting Paid to Shame Their Own Country at the Olympics
WaPo CEO Resigns Days After Laying Off 300 Employees
Georgia's Jon Ossoff Says Trump Administration Imitates Rhetoric of 'History's Worst Regim...
U.S. Thwarts $4 Million Weapons Plot Aimed at Toppling South Sudan Government
Minnesota Mom, Daughter, and Relative Allegedly Stole $325k from SNAP
Michigan AG: Detroit Man Stole 12 Identities to Collect Over $400,000 in Public...
Does Maxine Waters Really Think Trump Will Be Bothered by Her Latest Tantrum?
Tipsheet

Not Enough Earmarks?


I know this is hard to believe, but there are actually some in Congress who believe we need MORE earmarks.  An article by Congressional Quarterly published  this week examined the distribution and process of earmarked dollars. They reported that in this years appropriation bills there were 5,670 earmarks totaling $4.2 billion; this doesn’t include an additional 1,000 earmarks worth $1.5 billion that had multiple sponsors.  Part of their report also highlighted the disparity between the earmarked dollars received by Democrat members, Republican members, African American members, and Hispanic members as they were ranked in that order from highest to lowest in average earmarked dollars received.
Advertisement


Congressional Black Caucus member Rep. William Lacy Clay (D-Mo.) decided that it was a shame there was a difference between Caucasian members and African American Members. He proposed to close the earmark gap by creating two new spending panel seats on the House Committee on Appropriations. He said that “More black appropriators would be just a step to get at the inequities in the process”.  Basically affirmative action for earmarking.

The real inequity is the existence of an institutionalized process of wasting taxpayers money.  It still amazes me that the immediate response by many here in Congress is to address a disparity in earmarks by increasing the amount of earmarks for those whose average is lower rather than decreasing the average of those who get the most. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement