A Tale of Two Assassins
Why Politico's Headline About Undercover FBI Assets at the J6 Riot Is Priceless
That ProPublica Hatchet Job on Pete Hegseth Just Got Worse
Time Magazine Asked Trump What He Thought Was Kamala’s Worst Error in the...
Trump's Nominee for FBI Director Dropped a Major Allegation About the CIA, COVID,...
Amazon, Meta Donate $1 Million to Trump’s Inaugural Fund
NJ Lawmaker Asked for His Reaction to Kirby's Drone Claim. He Didn't Mince...
GOP Rep Blasts What the Biden Administration Is Now Doing With Unused Border...
Seattle Traffic Sign Hacked to Display This Disturbing Message After Murder of UnitedHealt...
Remember Mayorkas' Impeachment Proceedings? Well...
Google Features ‘Non-Binary’ Influencer for Woke Christmas Ad
Food Network Now Trouncing CNN in Ratings
The Democrats' Buts
Government Is Not the Solution
Maintaining the SALT Deduction Is Good Tax Policy and Good Politics
Tipsheet

Just Release The Story Already!

It's been two years, so it's about time for a big scandal to break about New York's governor. Lo and behold, the New York Times has such a story about Gov. David Paterson — except they're not saying what it is. Instead, they're just talking about what they plan on writing, as is everyone else, including Paterson, who is getting pretty scared right about now. After all, the article is supposed to be a career-ending bombshell.... we think.
Advertisement


Here is the New York Times in an anonymous blog post on it's own blog:

One of his possible Republican rivals, Rick Lazio, has called for the article no one knows exists to be published or for The Times to say it doesn’t exist, all to clear the good name of the governor and end “the psychological warfare” against him.

Mr. Paterson on Tuesday met for 90 minutes with a reporter from The Times, and when asked later at a news conference if he had been asked about the most salacious of the rumors, he said he had not.

“No such questions related to any of that information was asked of me at any interview,” he said. “The article will be written about other subjects.”

But Mr. Paterson then criticized the paper for not formally tackling the issue of the story everyone is talking about that doesn’t exist.

“They don’t seem to be interested in addressing it or doing anything about it — I think it’s appalling,” he said.

Noticeably absent in this entry is any reference to the Times releasing or not releasing the actual piece, taking self-referential journalism to a new level of meta.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement