Why Is the Acting Secret Service Director Heaping Praise on Mayorkas?
The Usual Suspects Are Very Mad Terrorists Are Dying
Why Was Iran's 'Diplomat' Carrying a Hezbollah Pager?
The New York Times Tried to Bait JD Vance, But He Was Ready...
The Teamsters Just Delivered a Body Blow to Kamala
Michigan Dem Has a Warning for Harris
Agent 00-Zero
Politico Points to 'Warning Signs' of Harris-Walz Campaign
This Blue State Just Made a Bombshell Admission Just Months Before the Election
Harris-Walz Want to Take Your Guns Away
A ‘Trans’ Actor Was Nominated for ‘Best Supporting Actress’
Kamala Harris Still Has the Worst Answers on What to Do About Grocery...
Federal Reserve Cuts Interest Rates for the First Time in Four Years
Poll Shows a Close Race in Wisconsin
Columnist Engages in Quite the Distraction on Tim Walz's Stolen Valor
Tipsheet

Defending Cao

Quin Hillyer at AmSpec does a great job of defending the one Republican that voted for the health care bill... if he can be defended. I kind of see his point... Joseph Cao's vote wouldn't have made a difference.
Advertisement
But I don't think it reflects well upon the Party as a whole to have even one of our Members vote for this horrendous monstrosity of a bill.
Conservatives need to take a deep breath, relax, and stop bashing Joseph Cao. The man never claimed to be a fully committed economic conservative. He represents a district that is about 75 percent Democrat and 62 percent black (or thereabouts). He SAID ALL ALONG, FOR MONTHS, that he would probably vote for health care reform if it included strong pro-life language such as the Stupak Amendment. He stuck to his guns, even though his district is not majority pro-life. He is a traditionalist Catholic, former Jesuit seminarian, and he stands up for the principles he holds dear, one of which is the sanctity of innocent life. He is willing to lose his office on behalf of that pro-life stance.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement