Netanyahu Gives an Option to Terrorists Still Holding Hostages in Gaza
Did You Catch Kamala's Awkward Pause When Bret Baier Asked This Question?
Look Away, Democrats. Obama Has Some Unfiltered Observations About Kamala.
The NY Times Plagiarism Expert Steals Its Thunder, and Public Trust in the...
Anti-Gunners Overstating Research on Mandatory Storage Laws
How Black Voters View Trump
Trump to Headline Catholic Dinner While Kamala Will Send In Pre-Recorded Tape
View Co-Host Accuses Fox News of 'Racism, Sexism' After Kamala Interview
This Is How Many Million Illegal Aliens Would Be Imported Into the U.S....
Here's What Cardinal Dolan Has to Say About Kamala Harris Skipping Out on...
One Country Just Made It Illegal to Seek Surrogacy Abroad
Liberal Poll Shows Republican Bernie Moreno Ahead in 'Toss-Up' Ohio Senate Race
These Media Headlines on Harris' Fox News Interview May Reveal a Larger Pattern
'There Is Something Pathological Going on Here': JD Vance Reacts to Harris' Fox...
Investigative Task Force Commissioned by Mayorkas Urges Overhaul of Secret Service Leaders...
Tipsheet

DC's Gun Right Now Apply To Western States

The landmark Heller decision that permitted DC residents to have guns in limited capacities inside their own homes has now been extended to the Ninth Circuit, which covers most western states. The court found that the Fourteenth Amendment -- which extends most of the protections in the Bill of Rights from the federal to the state level -- also applies to the second Amendment. From
Advertisement
Ilya Shapiro on the Cato Institute's blog:
In short, residents of Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington now join D.C. residents in having their Second Amendment rights protected.  And courts covering other parts of the country — most immediately the Seventh Circuit, based in Chicago — will have their chance to make the same interpretation in due course.

Shapiro highlights a footnote by Ninth Circuit Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain, which could have significant implications for the way the Second Amendment it viewed in future rulings.
Some may disagree with the decision of the Founders to enshrine a given right in the Constitution.  If so, then the people can amend the document.  But such amendments are not for the courts to ordain.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement