Nobody’s Calling London
Biden Will Not Like This Executive Privilege Decision...But He's Probably Too Cooked to...
Dems Might Be Overplaying Their Hand on DHS Shutdown for the Most Obvious...
GOP Rep Who Trashed Islam in a Tweet Had the Perfect Response to...
CNN's Abby Phillip Kept the Network's False Narrative About the Alleged ISIS-Inspired NYC...
The Democrats' Christian Darling Has a Very Interesting Opinion on the Ten Commandments
Breaking: Driver Detained After Suspicious Vehicle Drove Through Barricades Near the White...
Washington Democrats Imposed an Insane Income Tax Rate, Now This Company Is Leaving...
Teen Pilot Pulled Off an Amazing Emergency Landing on a Florida Highway
The Democrats’ Republic of Iran
The Sin of Accepting Support From Jews
Iran’s New Supreme Leader: The Rise of Mojtaba Khamenei
Is Proof of Citizenship Really Jim Crow 2.0
A Landmark Verdict Sparks the Collapse of Youth Gender-Affirming Surgeries, but True Justi...
SAVE Act Lifted by Paxton-Cornyn Race
Tipsheet

SCOTUS Passes on Campus Free Speech Case, Thomas and Alito Dissent

 SCOTUS Passes on Campus Free Speech Case, Thomas and Alito Dissent
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a challenge to university “bias response teams” that conservatives say go against free speech by silencing their viewpoints.

Advertisement

But Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas indicated they would have granted a hearing on the lawsuit brought by the Indiana University students.

“I would grant the petition. It raises an important question affecting universities nationwide; Speech First estimates that over 450 universities have similar bias-reporting schemes,” Justice Thomas wrote in his dissent. Justice Alito agreed and said that the case should be on the court’s docket.

The students argue that the bias-response team targets conservative speech by enabling anonymous reports of what are deemed “offensive” remarks.

The students are represented by the free speech advocacy group Speech First. The group points to threats of discipline against conservatives who held differing opinions on “gender identity, immigration, affirmative action, and the Israel-Palestine conflict. They sued Indiana University for forcing students to self-censor out of fear of retribution. However, the university claims that the bias response teams aren’t meant for punishment, but for education and support.

Advertisement

Related:

SUPREME COURT

“Given the number of schools with bias response teams, this court eventually will need to resolve the split over a student’s right to challenge such programs. The court’s refusal to intervene now leaves students subject to a ‘patchwork of First Amendment rights,’ with a student’s ability to challenge his university’s bias response policies varying depending on accidents of geography,” Thomas continued. “Because one of our 'primary functions is to resolve ‘important matter[s]’ on which the courts of appeals are ‘in conflict,’ we should not let this confusion persist.”

The Court did not provide an explanation for declining Speech First’s case.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos