Gavin Newsom Is Crushing the Field In This 2028 Preview
Corrupt Illinois Mayor Thinks She Can Win in Georgia As a Republican
Active Shooter at Temple Israel in West Bloomfield, Michigan
Check Out What London Is Now Recommending City Buses Carry for Some Unspoken...
Gunman Dead After Opening Fire at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia
Senator Josh Hawley Makes Major Announcement About Popular Abortion Pill
Women Do Not Have to Compromise on Trans Rights
UK Schools Warned Students' Drawings Could Be 'Blasphemous.' Take a Guess Why.
Mother of the Virginia Woman Murdered by a Violent Criminal Illegal Alien Speaks...
No Comparison: Prophet vs. King
President Trump Unloads on Thomas Massie at Kentucky Rally: ‘We Gotta Get Rid...
Tim Burchett Blasts ‘Snobs’ Attacking Trump DHS Nominee Markwayne Mullin Over Lack of...
Just Days After ISIS-Inspired Terror Attack in NYC, Here's What Mayor Mamdani Is...
Here's What Trump Had to Say About Those Iranian Sleeper Cells
Trans Mania Sweeps New Mexico Schools – Even Elementaries Will ‘Affirm’ Gender Choices
Tipsheet

Gun Accessory Company Agrees to $1.75 Million Settlement With Families of Buffalo Shooting Victims

Gun Accessory Company Agrees to $1.75 Million Settlement With Families of Buffalo Shooting Victims
AP Photo/Joshua Bessex

A firearm accessory company has agreed to pay out a massive settlement to the families of the racially-motivated mass shooting at a supermarket in New York.

This comes after New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit against Mean Arms, a gun accessory company. At the center of the lawsuit is a part of the company's product that can be removed, allowing users to use “high-capacity” magazines in their rifles. This is what the gunman who targeted black New Yorkers at Tops Supermarket in Buffalo did before carrying out the shooting.

Advertisement

From NBC News:

The agreement with Georgia-based Mean Arms settles a lawsuit filed by James and covers claims from various victims’ families and survivors of the 2022 attack at Tops Friendly Market. They also reached agreements to resolve their own separate suits against gunman Payton Gendron’s family and a gun seller, Vintage Firearms LLC, the plaintiffs’ lawyers announced Wednesday.

The claims against Mean Arms focused on an item that locks a magazine onto a rifle. The lock is supposed to keep people from swapping in high-capacity magazines, which are illegal in New York.

But according to James, Gendron easily removed the lock from an AR-15-style rifle and was able to add high-capacity magazines. She also said the company provided step-by-step instructions on the back of its product packaging on how to remove the lock.

“We hope that by holding this manufacturer accountable and banning it from selling this device in New York state, we can offer the people of Buffalo some measure of comfort,” James, a Democrat, said at a news conference in the city.

Advertisement

Everytown for Gun Safety, an anti-gun organization that represented some of the survivors and victims’ relatives, celebrated the settlement in a statement. “Everytown’s partnership with the New York Attorney General’s Office led to the first lawsuit to hold Mean Arms accountable, filed on the one-year anniversary of the shooting, and then was followed by multiple private lawsuits naming Mean as well,” the organization said.

On May 14, 2022, an 18-year-old white supremacist traveled to the supermarket, which was located in a predominantly black neighborhood. He opened fire using an AR-15 rifle, killing ten people and wounding three others in a racially motivated hate crime. He reportedly had researched prior racist shootings and posted a 180-page manifesto featuring several racist statements.

The anti-gunners pounced on the opportunity to use the racial aspect of the shooting to push for gun control — even though the history of gun control has been racist from its inception.

This case represents another front in the anti-gunners’ war against the Second Amendment, which makes it difficult for them to prevent people from keeping and bearing arms. If they can’t rely on laws, they will use lawfare against gun companies. Their hope is that by forcing these companies to spend money on lawsuits, they can put at least some of them out of business. 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement