Latest Development on Alex Pretti Shooting Tears Up Another Lib Narrative
Person Injured in Border Patrol-Involved Shooting in Arizona
Tom Homan Just Announced Major Action Against Anti-ICE Protesters in Minneapolis
Justice Department Withdraws Warrant for Don Lemon's Arrest, but He's Not Out of...
Trump Delivers Dysphoria to Davos As He Dominates the World Economic Forum...
Inside the Democrats' Crowded, Messy, Race to the Left in Iowa Senate Primary
Guess What Some Virginia Dems Are Asking People to Do When They See...
UK Officials Admit They Have No Plan as 600 Islamic Migrant Men Are...
The Trans Trend May Be Dying. But the Fallout Is Just Beginning.
Exactly What All Are We Losing in Minnesota?
The End of the Road for the Little Dinner That Could
Scott Jennings Blasts Tim Walz and Jacob Frey for Refusing to Cooperate with...
Tom Homan Slams Mika Brzezinski for Her Anti-ICE Rhetoric in Fiery Interview
The Declaration of Independence: A Framework for Limited Government
Tipsheet

Zohran Mamdani's Going to Have a Hard Time Escaping the Trap Eric Adams Set on His Way Out

AP Photo/Brittainy Newman

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani is having a hard time with a “legal booby trap” former Mayor Eric Adams left behind just before leaving office.

On his way out, Adams created a new Charter Revision Commission and appointed its members. He then instructed the entity to explore moving New York City to nonpartisan elections, according to Politico.

Advertisement

Hours before Adams left office on Dec. 31, the lame-duck mayor established a legally protected commission packed predominantly with loyalists and tasked with exploring a ballot question about open primaries, a proposed change in the city’s electoral machinery that, if implemented, would make it more difficult for Mamdani, a democratic socialist, to win a second term.

In the weeks since, the question of how to undo — or at the very least blunt — the impact of Adams’ zombie commission has attracted the attention of the city’s likely next corporation counsel, spawned a bill in Albany that would allow Mamdani to disband the outfit and spurred government ethics experts to explore how Adams’ creation might be reconciled to the history books as just another quirk of his tragic turn as city executive.

“This sets up a mayoral institution that is potentially in conflict with the sitting mayor, and that strikes me as very unwise and petty,” said Richard Briffault, a government expert at Columbia Law School and former chair of the city Conflicts of Interest Board. “This is purely hostile.”

Advertisement

Charter commissions are temporary bodies that review the city’s governing document and propose changes directly to voters through ballot initiatives. Adams specifically directed the commission to look at whether the city should switch to an open, nonpartisan primary system.

The commission will hold hearings, take public input, and place charter amendments on the ballot for New York City voters to approve or reject. Other commissions of this type have made significant changes to the city’s charter over the years. It created the modern City Council, changed term limits, and altered land-use processes.

What makes this even worse for Mamdani is that he cannot disband the commission until it gets the proposals on the ballot or reaches the end of its two-year term. During this period, the City Council cannot place its own charter question on the ballot, meaning the new mayor can’t run their own competing ballot measure.

However, Mamdani is not completely out of options. He can also block funding to the commission or attempt legal challenges against it.

Mamdani’s team slammed the move as an effort to subvert the will of the voters who just elected him. Dora Pekec, a Mamdani spokesperson, called the commission “yet another ploy from the Adams administration to circumvent the voice of New Yorkers who elected Zohran Mamdani as mayor” and that his team is reviewing “all available options.”

Advertisement

The reason Mamdani and his team are freaking out over this is because if the ballot measure succeeds, it would create a system in which all candidates run together, with the top two winners advancing to the general election. These systems tend to favor candidates who appeal to the broadest swath of voters, which means it is more likely that a moderate would win out over an extreme ideologue who thrive in closed party primaries.

In a city like New York, it could dampen the ability of a democratic socialist like Mamdani to attain power. 

If New York City voters approve the ballot measure, it would certainly shake up the city’s political scene. We can expect to see an aggressive fight over this issue over the next two years

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement