California Is Doing What Now for Homeless Illegal Aliens?!
UK Residents Just Got a Punch to the Gut Regarding This Economic Survey
'I Dig It': Maine's Dem Senate Hopeful Apparently Likes Watching Jewish People Die
NRCC Fundraising Shows Midterm Momentum Is on the Republicans' Side
Virginia's Red Flag Laws Did Nothing to Prevent Gun Violence
Former Virginia Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax and Wife Dead in Murder-Suicide
Minnesota Man Uses His Kitchen Sink to Show How Messed Up His State...
Gov. Spanberger Announced This Defense Contractor Will Expand in VA. There's Just One...
The Pentagon Offered an Update on Operation Epic Fury Amid Ceasefire and Blockade
Boston Loves Illegal Immigrants So Much, It Uses Our Tax Dollars to Pay...
Scott Jennings Teaches David Hogg Some Foreign Policy Lessons
Ohio Police Did a Welfare Check on a 91-Year-Old Woman, and It Did...
Ayatollahs: Generationally Stupid
Mamdani Just Unveiled a New Tax Targeting the City's Fleeing Wealthy
Stephen Miller Goes Off on the United States' Supposed NATO Allies
Tipsheet

After SCOTUS Loss, Anti-Gunners Have Cooked Up Their Most Desperate Bill Yet

After SCOTUS Loss, Anti-Gunners Have Cooked Up Their Most Desperate Bill Yet
AP Photo/Seth Perlman, File

Just after getting their derrieres handed to them by the Supreme Court, anti-gunner Democratic lawmakers introduced a bill to dismantle protections for gun manufacturers.

Advertisement

Earlier in the day, the Supreme Court ruled against the Mexican government, which sued several American gun companies, blaming them for fueling cartel violence. The lawsuit erroneously alleged that companies like Smith & Wesson and others facilitated the transfer of weapons to violent drug cartels. It was essentially an effort to deflect blame for Mexico’s inability to curtail gun violence on its soil.

The Supreme Court told Mexico to pound sand in a unanimous decision explaining how ridiculous Mexico’s accusations were. They cited the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which shields these companies from civil liability if their firearms are used to commit crimes.

Now, Democrats want to repeal the PLCAA. How predictable.

Sens. Chris Murphy (D-CT) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) were joined by a slew of Democratic lawmakers in the House and Senate in introducing the Equal Access to Justice for Victims of Gun Violence Act “to ensure that victims of gun violence have their day in court and that negligent gun companies and gun sellers are not shielded from liability when they disregard public safety,” according to a press release.

Advertisement

Murphy argued that “there’s absolutely no reason why the gun industry should get special treatment when it comes to negligence.”

“PLCAA is the ultimate sweetheart deal – legal immunity afforded to basically no other industry for a product that kills tens of thousands of Americans every year,” Blumenthal bloviated.

Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA), who enjoys threatening Americans with nuclear weapons, claimed, “No industry in American (sic) has a liability shield like gun manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and importers.”

Several anti-gunner organizations endorsed the measure, including Brady, GIFFORDS Law Center, Everytown for Gun Safety, March for Our Lives, and several others.

If this bill were to pass, it would repeal key components of the PLCAA, meaning that victims of gun violence could sue gun makers and sellers if their guns were used in a crime. It would also make gun trace data available in civil lawsuits. This information is typically barred from court proceedings.

Of course, the chances of this bill passing are about as favorable as Hunter Biden passing a drug test. With Republicans controlling both chambers of Congress and Donald Trump as president, this bill is going nowhere. But since they have no power at the moment, Democrats have to at least pretend to be doing something, right?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos