When the Law Is Optional, You Have Tyranny
The Olympics Have Ended. We Should End Sports ‘Journalism,’ Too.
It's Time for Another Episode of Scott Jennings Shredding Liberal Narratives on CNN
Did Donald Trump Call Into C-SPAN's Washington Journal? Here's What Happened.
Tucker Carlson's Sleight of Hand
Democrats Are Already Dumping on Newsom
The Great Replacement Is Worse Than You Imagined
Jesse Jackson’s Real Legacy
The Poison of Marxist Leftism
You Should Be Terrorized by What JPMorgan Did to Trump
The Party of Hate Is Unleashing Political Violence
San Fernando Valley Film Accountant Pleads Guilty to $2 Million Embezzlement Scheme
Gavin Newsom, Bernie Sanders Say They Don't Know How to Get Birth Certificates
Romanian Hacker Pleads Guilty in 2021 Breach of Oregon State Government Office
Chaos Erupts in Mexico After Elimination of Cartel Leader 'El Mencho'
Tipsheet

Supreme Court Just Handed Anti-Gunners a Major Win – but There Is Still Room for Hope

Supreme Court Just Handed Anti-Gunners a Major Win – but There Is Still Room for Hope
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File

The Supreme Court has declined to take up two gun rights cases, a disappointing development for those who support gun rights. However, there is still reason for hope — especially when it comes to legislation banning so-called “assault weapons.”

Advertisement

The two cases involved state bans on rifles like the AR-15 and similar legislation against “high-capacity magazines.” These represent some of the most controversial types of anti-gunner legislation passed at the state level.

From The Associated Press

The majority did not explain its reasoning in turning down the cases over high-capacity magazines and state bans on guns like the AR-15, popular weapons that have also been used in mass shootings.

But three conservative justices on the nine-member court publicly noted their disagreement, and a fourth said he is skeptical that assault-weapons bans are constitutional.

Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch said they would have taken a case challenging Maryland’s ban, and Justice Clarence Thomas wrote separately to say the law likely runs afoul of the Second Amendment.

“I would not wait to decide whether the government can ban the most popular rifle in America,” Thomas wrote. “That question is of critical importance to tens of millions of law-abiding AR–15 owners throughout the country.”

The Firearms Policy Coalition issued a statement expressing its disappointment with the decision. 

We are disappointed that some members of the Supreme Court did not have the judicial courage to do their most important job and enforce the Constitution. Like millions of peaceable gun owners across the country, we are frustrated that the Court continues to allow lower courts to treat the Second Amendment as a second-class right. But more than anything else, we are more resolved than ever to Fight Forward and eliminate these immoral bans throughout the nation, whatever and however long it takes.

Advertisement

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis also weighed in, saying the court is more concerned with protecting illegal immigrants than defending gun rights. “The Court has more urgency in bailing out illegal aliens than in upholding the rights of Americans — even in regards to an enumerated right in the Constitution,” he wrote in a post on X.

Second Amendment attorney Kostas Moros said the court “has forsaken us.”

However, despite agreeing with the decision not to take up the cases, Justice Brett Kavanaugh gave reason for hope, indicating that the Supreme Court would likely take up the issue in a later session. “Additional petitions for certiorari will likely be before this Court shortly and, in my view, this Court should and presumably will address the AR-15 issue soon, in the next Term or two,” he wrote.

Advertisement

In his opinion, Kavanaugh explained that “it can be analytically difficult to distinguish the AR-15s at issue here from the handguns at issue in Heller.”

This is certainly not a welcome development for those who value the Second Amendment. At some point, bans on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines must be settled. The Court chose not to address the issue, which means that states criminalizing people like Dexter Taylor will be free to continue targeting law-abiding gun owners for exercising their right to keep and bear arms. Hopefully, we won't have to wait too much longer for the Court to settle the matter once and for all.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement