We Have No Moral Obligation to Forgive or Forget the Biden Lies
Joe Biden’s Memory and Prostate Got Nuked…and Dems Know More Bad Stuff Is...
After These Remarks, It's Clear That Hillary Clinton Is Bored and Miserable
There Is No Reason to Believe Democrats on Biden or Anything Else
Margaret Brennan Needs a Diploma After Getting Schooled by Two Separate Republicans
Delivering Victories at Trump Speed
The Wilson-Biden Cover-Ups
We Will Bury You!
Harvard Is a Nakba
Courts Block Effort to Cut Spending As Credit Rating Tanks
Democrats’ Filibuster Hypocrisy on Full Display in Electric Vehicle Mandate Fight
Campus Anti-Semitism Will Only End When Universities Take Action Against Students Promotin...
It’s the Spending, Stupid
Trump Posts Cryptic Video of 'Mysterious Deaths' Linked To Hillary Clinton
Trump, Grenell Lead Kennedy Center's Shift Away from Woke Programming, Embrace Family-Frie...
Tipsheet

Mark Harris Says North Carolina Should Have a New Election- Opponent Responds

John D. Simmons /The Charlotte Observer via AP

Leading Republican House candidate Mark Harris, to the surprise of attendees in the hearing room, said that North Carolina should have another election due to ballot tampering allegations.

Advertisement

“I believe a new election should be called,” Harris said. “It’s become clear to me that public confidence in the 9th District has been undermined to an extent that a new election is warranted.”

Harris said he wasn’t aware of any illegal activity occurring during his campaign.

Harris was winning North Carolina’s 9th Congressional District three months prior by 905 votes, according to The Washington Post. Harris competed against Democrat Dan McCready during the election. McCready responded to the situation in a Tweet.

“State investigators established on Monday their theory of the case,” Vox wrote. “That a Republican-hired local operative, Leslie McCrae Dowless, directed a coordinated scheme to unlawfully collect, falsely witness, and otherwise tamper with absentee ballots — and workers who say they had assisted him in the scheme delivered damning testimony.”

Advertisement

Dowless refused to testify to the state board of elections, but on Thursday the board said that Harris’s campaign provided evidence containing, “previously undisclosed contacts between the candidate and Dowless.” State officials blamed Harris’ campaign attorney, John Branch, for withholding relevant evidence, but the attorney said that it wasn’t intentional.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement