Let’s Take Kamala Up on Her Proposal of ‘No Bad Ideas’
No One Trusts Public Health Experts Anymore, and It's All Their Fault
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 321: What Jesus Said About Food
OK, So Why Do Jews Keep Voting For People Who Hate Them?
Democrat Crimes Need to Be Prosecuted, Pronto!
The Numbers That Ended The Late Show: $100M Budget, $40M Loss, 2.7M Viewers
10-Time Felon Allegedly Posed as Successful Businessman to Swindle Elderly Woman Out of...
The RNC Just Scored a Major Election Security Victory in North Carolina
Mangione Superfan Who Celebrated Brian Thompson's Alleged Murder Is Daughter of CVS Health...
Marco Rubio Just Torched the Panicans Crying Over the Iran Peace Deal
Wait, This Democrat Candidate Refuses To Say the Pledge?
The Trump Administration Just Handed This Commie a Subpoena
God and the Jefferson Memorial
What Explains the Catastrophe of Seattle's Mayor Katie? Could Be Evolution
Science Is Making the Humanity of Unborn Babies Harder to Ignore
Tipsheet

Senate Committee Approves Shortening Judicial Nominee Debate Time

Senate Committee Approves Shortening Judicial Nominee Debate Time
AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

In a tight 10-9 party-line vote Wednesday, members of the Senate Rules Committee approved a change to the rules to shorten the debate time for judicial nominees.

Advertisement

Currently, up to 30 hours of debate time is allowed before a nominee is approved for service. But if the new rule, which was introduced by Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO) and James Lankford (R-OK), is approved in the Senate floor, it will reduce the maximum time to just two hours. The rule would apply to just about all judicial and executive branch nominees, but not nominees for the Supreme Court or other “high level positions,” according to CNN.

“Republicans backed the proposal,” wrote CNN. “Which would limit debate time on nominees, arguing during a spirited session of the Senate Rules Committee that it was the only way to overcome what they described as unprecedented obstruction by Democrats of Trump's executive branch and judicial appointments.”

Democrats may not be on board with the decision. But it may not matter if Republican majority decides to use the “nuclear option.” In that case, the rule would only need to pass by simple majority, with 50 out of the 53 GOP senators approving the rule.

Blunt said that Democrats issued 128 filibusters on President Donald Trump’s nominees, more than any other president in history.

"Presidents deserve to have their teams in place," Blunt said. "Never before have we seen the level of obstruction in the confirmation process in the first two years of a presidency."

Advertisement

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is expected to bring the rule to the Senate floor, according to Politico.

“The real crisis here is the administration itself below the cabinet level has an enormous number of vacancies,” McConnell said. “Once we get to cloture on a number of these nominees they aren’t even controversial. So it’s pretty obvious the whole purpose is just to eat up floor time.”

Senate Rules Committee Ranking Member Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) openly spoke against the rule, stating that removing most of the debate time would diminish “important checks and balances” in the nomination process.

“If this passes, roughly 80 percent of all Trump administration nominees will be able to be confirmed with just two hours of debate time,” she said. “In Minnesota, that’s about the amount of time it takes to make a hot dish.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement