How JD Vance Roasted Joe Biden Over His Phantom Passing of the Equal...
Hordes of Miserable Liberal White Women Storm DC to Whine About Trump's Return
Undoing The Disaster That Is Joe Biden
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 251: What the Old Testament Says About Leadership
So Many Ways to Go Wrong After Winning an Election
AZ Public Schools Drown in Financial Scandals, and All the Democrats Care About...
Why the Education Department’s Actions Against Christian Schools and Career Colleges Deman...
Iranian Mullahs About to Face a Trump Tornado
On This International Holocaust Remembrance Day, We Must Remember the Righteous Too
When the Terrorists Who Tried to Kills Us Go Free
Glenn Beck Offers Chilling Reason Why He Thinks Trump Moved Inauguration Indoors
Tim Walz Mocked Thoroughly for Post on 'Bad Weather'
Trump’s $TRUMP Meme Coin Soars to $30 Billion in 24 Hours, Shaking Up...
PETA Lies: 'Trump Did Nothing to End Animal Experimentation'
Here's What Bill Gates Had to Say About His Three-Hour Meeting With Trump
Tipsheet

Many Welfare Recipients Eligible for More in Benefits Than Several Full-Time Workers

A new study conducted by the CATO Institute finds that New York welfare recipients are eligible for more in benefits than teachers earn. The study says that a New York mother of two is eligible for $38,004 in welfare benefits, which is more than the annual salary of a New York entry-level school teacher.

Advertisement

But it’s not only New York. CATO also found that in many states welfare pays better than work. Hawaii had the highest wage-equivalent benefits for a mother and two children at $60,590. Seriously?!

That’s not all! The study also found that “33 states and the District of Columbia offer welfare benefits that pay recipients more than an $8-an-hour job would. Twelve states and the District of Columbia offer welfare packages that pay better than a $15-an-hour job does.”

Wow. Talk about a system that needs to be fixed! Now, I am not trying to say that people on welfare are lazy, but what incentive is there for unemployed Americans to try and get back in the work force? If you pay them more not to work than what they could actually earn at a full-time job, why would anyone choose to go and work?

Since the 1960s and the “war on poverty” programs started, the U.S. taxpayers have spent over $15 trillion on these anti-poverty programs. The federal government has 126 low-income programs of which 72 offer citizens cash or in-kind benefits.

If this is not a sign that the welfare system needs to be overhauled, I don’t know what is.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement