It’s Their Own Fault We No Longer Default to Respect
There Was a Horrific School Shooting in Canada...and Their Police Used a Weird...
Person of Interest Arrested in Connection to the Abduction of Nancy Guthrie
Fraud Nation
Technological Sweet Spot
Public Opinion: A Tyrant Against Hard Decisions
Peggy Noonan Loses Her Noodle Over Washington Post Layoffs
Misconduct Rampant: America’s Leaders Increasingly Prioritize Agendas Over Fairness, Laws
Pass the SAVE America Act
Trump's DOJ Seeks Justice for Victims of Benghazi
2026 Olympics: Let’s Talk About Crotch Scandals
The Washington Post Is Paying the Bill for Free Speech
Republicans Siding With Big Banks in Stablecoin Fight Could Tank Trump’s Affordability Age...
Freezing Deaths, Garbage Piles in Largest Sanctuary City
Woke DC Grand Jury Denies Indictments of Six Democrats Accused of Sedition
Tipsheet

New York Times Quietly Revises Story that Criticized Bloomberg and Stop-and-Frisk

Well if Mayor Bloomberg doesn’t like it, you’d better fix it! When liberal media is starting to turn on you, you had better act quickly in order to thwart those efforts Mr. Bloomberg! Earlier this week the New York Times ran an article on its front page about ‘stop-and-frisk’ and Eric Holder. Well following criticism from a spokesman for Mayor Bloomberg, the newspaper quietly revised its piece.

Advertisement

According to the Bloomberg spokesman, Marc La Vorgna, the piece was unfairly giving the impression that the stop-and-frisk policy was to blame for higher incarceration rates. When the piece was originally printed on Monday, the New York Times story read, “Those policies have been denounced as discriminatory and responsible for explosive growth in the prison population”.

By Wednesday, the above text was removed from the article, although you can find an old version of the article on Google. According to La Vorgna, “Front page NYT today incorrectly lumps stop/frisk in w/national mass incarceration trend. Incarceration rates in NYC have plummeted”.

A New York Times spokesman told Buzzfeed “the change was made to avoid repeating the same thoughts below in the story. These types of changes are common when editing web stories.”

Isn’t this all just so polite?

Advertisement

After many issues this week with online news sources, it is hard to tell what the real stories are anymore. The New York Times website went offline earlier this week too due to potential cyber-hacking issues. But this followed an earlier piece shredding the Clinton Foundation. Traditionally liberal media outlets have been taking on bigger issues within the Democratic Party, which is very out of character. Perhaps this is a sign of actual problems within the party.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos