Mayhem Strikes California Christmas Parade
Hunter Biden Indicted on Tax Evasion Charges
How Were the Universities Lost?
Facebook Groomers, CNN Travel Writers Do Not Want You to Travel, and the...
This Chanukah, Let's Vow to Defeat Our New Oppressors: Higher Education
Biden Lies Preposterously About Meeting His Son Hunter's Clients
For True Evil, Look Not to Israel or America but to Communism
A Short History of Joe's Long Record of Lying About Biden Inc.
My Take On the Horrific UNLV Shooting
6 Extremely Stubborn Facts About the Israeli-Palestinian Crisis
You Say You Want an Intifada, Part II
Grass Roots Liberty Force Emerges in Virginia
So Far Past the Rubicon
This Is Who Melania Trump Is Reportedly Pushing for Her Husband's VP, and...
Hunter Biden Hit With Nine New Indictments

How KJP Managed to Make Biden's Painful 'Where's Jackie?' Gaffe Even Worse

Yesterday's embarrassment, covered here by Katie, isn't the type of thing that will drive the news cycle for very long -- but it was truly cringeworthy in the moment.  If you missed it, the backstory is that Republican Congresswoman Jackie Walorski was killed in a tragic traffic accident last month, along with two young staffers.  At the White House yesterday, presiding over an event on hunger and nutrition, President Biden spent some time acknowledging various elected officials from both parties who'd worked on related issues.  Some of whom were present in the room.  Biden apparently that Walorski might be among them and asked out loud if she was there. Obviously, she was not


I saw this clip and winced.  My best guess was that Walorski's name had been on a list of lawmakers that Biden had glanced at, forgetting that she'd passed away, so he name-checked her.  That would be a bad mistake unto itself, partially attributable to bad staff work.  But young members of Congress don't die in shocking accidents very often; he should have known better.  In fact, he issued a solemn statement on the occasion of her passing.  This was a Veep-level, profoundly Bidenesque gaffe.  "Stand up Chuck," but worse.  For the families of those killed, the grief is still fresh, and this probably wasn't very amusing.  The obvious move would have been to recognize the error, admit it, and apologize.  Instead, we got this:

This makes no sense, as should have been painfully obvious. If the recently-deceased Congresswoman was "top of mind" for the president due to her work on these issues -- and because a White House event will soon be held in her honor, featuring her family -- he would not have asked if she was in the room.  He forgot.  Clearly.  To pretend that this wasn't a mistake is remarkably dumb and counter-productive.  A Democratic operative messaged me as the KJP spin videos were going viral: "Just admit he f***ed up, it isn't hard.  'Obviously the president misspoke and he regrets it.' Done!"  He also offered an assessment of her job performance that was strikingly similar to what I've been saying for months.  But that's how this administration operates.  They make bad decisions (like elevating her to this role), then clumsily double down.  Someone, or someones, made the call to tell the country that Biden didn't forget that Walorski had died, and shouted her out the way he did because he was thinking about her so much.  It's ludicrous on its face, yet that's what they went with.  If the pain and mourning weren't so recent for Walorski's family, this would be funny-bad.  Instead, it's cringe on top of cringe.  

Parting thought: This head-shaker would have been a small blip if they'd copped to it quickly and candidly, then moved on.  They instead proactively chose to attempt this insulting spin.  Why?  They're often quite bad at politics and optics, sure, but this one is especially confounding.  My suspicion is that they feared that Biden's mistake would be exploited by critics to further a narrative that he's forgetful and not 'all there.'  Which it immediately was, naturally, because...he did what he did.  But by denying plain reality with this stupendously idiotic explanation, they're drawing even more attention to the episode, and their defensiveness almost feels like at least a partial confirmation of the narrative they're trying to knock down.  How thoroughly foolish of them. But rather on-brand, no?


Trending on Townhall Videos